qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24
@ 2014-11-24 13:40 Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/3] apic: avoid getting out of halted state on masked PIC interrupts Paolo Bonzini
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

The following changes since commit 0e88f478508b566152c6681f4889ed9830a2c0a5:

  Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stefanha/tags/net-pull-request' into staging (2014-11-21 14:15:37 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:


  git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream

for you to fetch changes up to 5224c88dd3f771702d450780a25f155e0fc8bb2b:

  apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority (2014-11-24 14:37:45 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Three patches to fix ExtINT for the QEMU implementation of the local APIC.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Paolo Bonzini (3):
      apic: avoid getting out of halted state on masked PIC interrupts
      apic: fix loss of IPI due to masked ExtINT
      apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority

 hw/intc/apic.c    | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 target-i386/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/3] apic: avoid getting out of halted state on masked PIC interrupts
  2014-11-24 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Paolo Bonzini
@ 2014-11-24 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 2/3] apic: fix loss of IPI due to masked ExtINT Paolo Bonzini
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

After the next patch, if a masked PIC interrupts causes CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL
to be set, the CPU will spuriously get out of halted state.  While this
is technically valid, we should avoid that.

Make CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL run apic_update_irq in the right thread and then
look at CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD.  If CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD does not get set,
do not report the CPU as having work.

Also move the handling of software-disabled APIC from apic_update_irq
to apic_irq_pending, and always trigger CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL.  This will
be important once we will add a case that resets CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
from apic_update_irq.  We want to run it even if we go through
CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL, and even if the local APIC is software disabled.

Reported-by: Richard Bilson <rbilson@qnx.com>
Tested-by: Richard Bilson <rbilson@qnx.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 hw/intc/apic.c    |  8 +++++---
 target-i386/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/apic.c b/hw/intc/apic.c
index 03ff9e9..0653409 100644
--- a/hw/intc/apic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/apic.c
@@ -349,6 +349,11 @@ static int apic_get_arb_pri(APICCommonState *s)
 static int apic_irq_pending(APICCommonState *s)
 {
     int irrv, ppr;
+
+    if (!(s->spurious_vec & APIC_SV_ENABLE)) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+
     irrv = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
     if (irrv < 0) {
         return 0;
@@ -366,9 +371,6 @@ static void apic_update_irq(APICCommonState *s)
 {
     CPUState *cpu;
 
-    if (!(s->spurious_vec & APIC_SV_ENABLE)) {
-        return;
-    }
     cpu = CPU(s->cpu);
     if (!qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu)) {
         cpu_interrupt(cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL);
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index 3f13dfe..e9df33e 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -2912,8 +2912,14 @@ static bool x86_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
     X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
     CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
 
-    return ((cs->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD |
-                                      CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL)) &&
+#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
+    if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL) {
+        apic_poll_irq(cpu->apic_state);
+        cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL);
+    }
+#endif
+
+    return ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) &&
             (env->eflags & IF_MASK)) ||
            (cs->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI |
                                      CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT |
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PULL 2/3] apic: fix loss of IPI due to masked ExtINT
  2014-11-24 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/3] apic: avoid getting out of halted state on masked PIC interrupts Paolo Bonzini
@ 2014-11-24 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/3] apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 15:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Peter Maydell
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

This patch fixes an obscure failure of the QNX kernel on QEMU x86 SMP.
In QNX, all hardware interrupts come via the PIC, and are delivered by
the cpu 0 LAPIC in ExtINT mode, while IPIs are delivered by the LAPIC
in fixed mode.

This bug happens as follows:
- cpu 0 masks a particular PIC interrupt
- IPI sent to cpu 0 (CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD is set)
- before the IPI is accepted, the masked interrupt line is asserted by the
device

Since the interrupt is masked, apic_deliver_pic_intr will clear
CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD. The IPI will still be set in the APIC irr, but since
CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD is not set the cpu will not notice. Depending on the
scenario this can cause a system hang, i.e. if cpu 0 is expected to unmask
the interrupt.

In order to fix this, do a full check of the APIC before an EXTINT
is acknowledged.  This can result in clearing CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD, but
can also result in delivering the lost IPI.

Reported-by: Richard Bilson <rbilson@qnx.com>
Tested-by: Richard Bilson <rbilson@qnx.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 hw/intc/apic.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/apic.c b/hw/intc/apic.c
index 0653409..6ec5861 100644
--- a/hw/intc/apic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/apic.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ void apic_deliver_pic_intr(DeviceState *dev, int level)
             apic_reset_bit(s->irr, lvt & 0xff);
             /* fall through */
         case APIC_DM_EXTINT:
-            cpu_reset_interrupt(CPU(s->cpu), CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
+            apic_update_irq(s);
             break;
         }
     }
@@ -376,6 +376,8 @@ static void apic_update_irq(APICCommonState *s)
         cpu_interrupt(cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_POLL);
     } else if (apic_irq_pending(s) > 0) {
         cpu_interrupt(cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
+    } else if (!apic_accept_pic_intr(&s->busdev.qdev) || !pic_get_output(isa_pic)) {
+        cpu_reset_interrupt(cpu, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
     }
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/3] apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority
  2014-11-24 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/3] apic: avoid getting out of halted state on masked PIC interrupts Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 2/3] apic: fix loss of IPI due to masked ExtINT Paolo Bonzini
@ 2014-11-24 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2014-11-24 15:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Peter Maydell
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

This fixes another failure with ExtINT, demonstrated by QNX.  The failure
mode is as follows:
- IPI sent to cpu 0 (bit set in APIC irr)
- IPI accepted by cpu 0 (bit cleared in irr, set in isr)
- IPI sent to cpu 0 (bit set in both irr and isr)
- PIC interrupt sent to cpu 0

The PIC interrupt causes CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD to be set, but
apic_irq_pending observes that the highest pending APIC interrupt priority
(the IPI) is the same as the processor priority (since the IPI is still
being handled), so apic_get_interrupt returns a spurious interrupt rather
than the pending PIC interrupt. The result is an endless sequence of
spurious interrupts, since nothing will clear CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD.

Instead, ExtINT interrupts should have ignored the processor priority.
Calling apic_check_pic early in apic_get_interrupt ensures that
apic_deliver_pic_intr is called instead of delivering the spurious
interrupt.  apic_deliver_pic_intr then clears CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD if needed.

Reported-by: Richard Bilson <rbilson@qnx.com>
Tested-by: Richard Bilson <rbilson@qnx.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 hw/intc/apic.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/apic.c b/hw/intc/apic.c
index 6ec5861..0f97b47 100644
--- a/hw/intc/apic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/apic.c
@@ -571,7 +571,10 @@ int apic_get_interrupt(DeviceState *dev)
     apic_sync_vapic(s, SYNC_FROM_VAPIC);
     intno = apic_irq_pending(s);
 
-    if (intno == 0) {
+    /* if there is an interrupt from the 8259, let the caller handle
+     * that first since ExtINT interrupts ignore the priority.
+     */
+    if (intno == 0 || apic_check_pic(s)) {
         apic_sync_vapic(s, SYNC_TO_VAPIC);
         return -1;
     } else if (intno < 0) {
@@ -582,9 +585,6 @@ int apic_get_interrupt(DeviceState *dev)
     apic_set_bit(s->isr, intno);
     apic_sync_vapic(s, SYNC_TO_VAPIC);
 
-    /* re-inject if there is still a pending PIC interrupt */
-    apic_check_pic(s);
-
     apic_update_irq(s);
 
     return intno;
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24
  2014-11-24 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Paolo Bonzini
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/3] apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority Paolo Bonzini
@ 2014-11-24 15:01 ` Peter Maydell
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2014-11-24 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: QEMU Developers

On 24 November 2014 at 13:40, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> The following changes since commit 0e88f478508b566152c6681f4889ed9830a2c0a5:
>
>   Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/stefanha/tags/net-pull-request' into staging (2014-11-21 14:15:37 +0000)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
>   git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 5224c88dd3f771702d450780a25f155e0fc8bb2b:
>
>   apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority (2014-11-24 14:37:45 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Three patches to fix ExtINT for the QEMU implementation of the local APIC.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

Applied, thanks.

-- PMM

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-24 15:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-24 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/3] apic: avoid getting out of halted state on masked PIC interrupts Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 2/3] apic: fix loss of IPI due to masked ExtINT Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 13:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/3] apic: fix incorrect handling of ExtINT interrupts wrt processor priority Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-24 15:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.2 0/3] APIC fixes for 2014-11-24 Peter Maydell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).