From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvJ9c-00086b-Fr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:04:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvJ9X-0004k4-LW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:04:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvJ9X-0004jx-EX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:04:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 05:11:29 +0008 From: Jason Wang Message-Id: <1417410209.4969.0@smtp.corp.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1417166789-1960-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> References: <1417166789-1960-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost: Fix vhostfd leak in error branch List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: arei.gonglei@huawei.com Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:26 PM, arei.gonglei@huawei.com wrote: > From: Gonglei > > Signed-off-by: Gonglei > --- > hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c | 1 + > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c > index 308b393..dcb2bc5 100644 > --- a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c > +++ b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c > @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_realize(DeviceState *dev, > Error **errp) > vhost_dummy_handle_output); > if (err != NULL) { > error_propagate(errp, err); > + close(vhostfd); > return; > } > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > index 5d7c40a..5a12861 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c > @@ -817,10 +817,12 @@ int vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *hdev, void > *opaque, > int i, r; > > if (vhost_set_backend_type(hdev, backend_type) < 0) { > + close((uintptr_t)opaque); > return -1; > } > > if (hdev->vhost_ops->vhost_backend_init(hdev, opaque) < 0) { > + close((uintptr_t)opaque); > return -errno; > } > Patch looks fine. I wonder whether setting errno and goto fail would be better here? This will let vhost_backend_cleanup() to do the cleanup, e.g closeing fd or purging queue (for vhost uesr).