From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45175)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1XzNhR-0008Ee-SH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:43:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1XzNhL-0003Jp-My
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:43:53 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59161)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1XzNhL-0003Jc-Fr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:43:47 -0500
Message-ID: <1418381023.23141.6.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:43:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5489B313.80706@redhat.com>
References: <1418294973-21790-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1418294973-21790-7-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<5489B313.80706@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/10] sdl2: overhaul window size handling
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>

  Hi,

> > @@ -439,12 +424,14 @@ static void handle_keydown(SDL_Event *ev)
> >                               160);
> >                   height = (surface_height(scon->surface) * width) /
> >                       surface_width(scon->surface);
> > -
> > +                fprintf(stderr, "%s: scale to %dx%d\n",
> > +                        __func__, width, height);
> 
> I forgot to ask: What's the reason for this fprintf()? Thanks to "#if 0" 
> it doesn't do anything, but it seems kind of strange if this block would 
> not be commented out...

Just a debug printf.  Will go away when this code gets re-enabled.

cheers,
  Gerd