From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39024)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1WKZgc-00032r-Du
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:42:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1WKZgW-0006ft-Ep
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:42:06 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29107)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pmoore@redhat.com>) id 1WKZgW-0006dK-6t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:42:00 -0500
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:41:54 -0500
Message-ID: <1422240.VnSJ3J12An@sifl>
In-Reply-To: <20140226152501.5062.42074.stgit@localhost>
References: <20140226152501.5062.42074.stgit@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add shmctl(), mlock(),
	and munlock() to the syscall whitelist
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com

On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:25:01 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> Additional testing reveals that PulseAudio requires shmctl() and the
> mlock()/munlock() syscalls on some systems/configurations.  As before,
> on systems that do require these syscalls, the problem can be seen with
> the following command line:
> 
>   # qemu -monitor stdio  -sandbox on \
>          -device intel-hda -device hda-duplex
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
> ---
>  qemu-seccomp.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
> index caa926e..3db1e9b 100644
> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c
> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,10 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall
> seccomp_whitelist[] = { { SCMP_SYS(fchmod), 240 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(shmget), 240 },
>      { SCMP_SYS(shmat), 240 },
> -    { SCMP_SYS(shmdt), 240 }
> +    { SCMP_SYS(shmdt), 240 },
> +    { SCMP_SYS(shmctl), 240 },
> +    { SCMP_SYS(mlock), 240 },
> +    { SCMP_SYS(munlock), 240 }
>  };
> 
>  int seccomp_start(void)

Bump to bring this back the forefront of everyone's minds.  Can we get this 
merged?

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat