From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIhuP-0001WP-Cj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:09:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIhuL-0003Qb-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:09:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIhuL-0003QS-EH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:09:05 -0500 From: Eduardo Habkost Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:08:56 -0200 Message-Id: <1422986938-13469-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Small code cleanup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20F=C3=A4rber?= , Igor Mammedov Just two small code cleanups in target-i386/cpu.c. Patch 1/2 changes behavior of "-cpu ?" to not print feature names in reverse order anymore. Patch 2/2 doesn't introduce any behavior changes. Eduardo Habkost (2): target-i386: Simplify listflags() function target-i386: Eliminate unnecessary get_cpuid_vendor() function target-i386/cpu.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) -- 2.1.0