[Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/28] target-arm: Add checks that cpreg raw accesses are handled

[Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>]

Add assertion checking when cpreg structures are registered that they
either forbid raw-access attempts or at least make an attempt at
handling them. Also add an assert in the raw-accessor-of-last-resort,
to avoid silently doing a read or write from offset zero, which is
actually AArch32 CPU register r0.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1422282372-13735-3-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Greg Bellows <greg.bellows@linaro.org>
---
 target-arm/helper.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
index d214c9a..3b054ad 100644
--- a/target-arm/helper.c
+++ b/target-arm/helper.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static int aarch64_fpu_gdb_set_reg(CPUARMState *env, uint8_t *buf, int reg)
 
 static uint64_t raw_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 {
+    assert(ri->fieldoffset);
     if (cpreg_field_is_64bit(ri)) {
         return CPREG_FIELD64(env, ri);
     } else {
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ static uint64_t raw_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 static void raw_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
                       uint64_t value)
 {
+    assert(ri->fieldoffset);
     if (cpreg_field_is_64bit(ri)) {
         CPREG_FIELD64(env, ri) = value;
     } else {
@@ -174,6 +176,27 @@ static void write_raw_cp_reg(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
     }
 }
 
+static bool raw_accessors_invalid(const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
+{
+   /* Return true if the regdef would cause an assertion if you called
+    * read_raw_cp_reg() or write_raw_cp_reg() on it (ie if it is a
+    * program bug for it not to have the NO_RAW flag).
+    * NB that returning false here doesn't necessarily mean that calling
+    * read/write_raw_cp_reg() is safe, because we can't distinguish "has
+    * read/write access functions which are safe for raw use" from "has
+    * read/write access functions which have side effects but has forgotten
+    * to provide raw access functions".
+    * The tests here line up with the conditions in read/write_raw_cp_reg()
+    * and assertions in raw_read()/raw_write().
+    */
+    if ((ri->type & ARM_CP_CONST) ||
+        ri->fieldoffset ||
+        ((ri->raw_writefn || ri->writefn) && (ri->raw_readfn || ri->readfn))) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    return true;
+}
+
 bool write_cpustate_to_list(ARMCPU *cpu)
 {
     /* Write the coprocessor state from cpu->env to the (index,value) list. */
@@ -3536,6 +3559,14 @@ static void add_cpreg_to_hashtable(ARMCPU *cpu, const ARMCPRegInfo *r,
         r2->type |= ARM_CP_ALIAS;
     }
 
+    /* Check that raw accesses are either forbidden or handled. Note that
+     * we can't assert this earlier because the setup of fieldoffset for
+     * banked registers has to be done first.
+     */
+    if (!(r2->type & ARM_CP_NO_RAW)) {
+        assert(!raw_accessors_invalid(r2));
+    }
+
     /* Overriding of an existing definition must be explicitly
      * requested.
      */
-- 
1.9.1