From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Kevin OConnor <kevin@koconnor.net>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Delaying -rc0?
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:13:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425471194.8389.48.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vbih2pea.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Mi, 2015-03-04 at 08:27 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took
> >> a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet
> >> in master.
> >
> > You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests
> > with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely
> > to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need
> > fixing, simply because of their size...
>
> Yes. The current PCI pull request is clearly too big for its own
> good.
... and it has non-pci stuff in there too. Guess it would make sense to
split stuff into multiple queues (acpi, pc, acpi, virtio, ...). Helps
to keep the size reasonable. I think it works better overall, even if
it is annoying at times when there are patch dependencies between
branches.
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 12:33 [Qemu-devel] Delaying -rc0? Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-02 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2015-03-02 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-03 13:12 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-03 13:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-03 14:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-03 15:07 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-03 15:14 ` Peter Maydell
2015-03-04 7:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-04 12:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2015-03-04 12:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 12:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 16:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-04 17:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 12:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-02 21:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-03-03 13:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 7:27 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425471194.8389.48.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).