From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTYST-0005tH-4A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:17:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTYSP-00077A-4z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:17:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTYSO-000774-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:17:05 -0500 From: Eduardo Habkost Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:38:45 -0300 Message-Id: <1425569930-6660-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1425569930-6660-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <1425569930-6660-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] cpu: No need to zero-initialize numa_node List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, Paolo Bonzini , Gu Zheng , Igor Mammedov , anshul.makkar@profitbricks.com, =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20F=C3=A4rber?= QOM objects are already zero-filled when instantiated, there's no need to explicitly set numa_node to 0. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- exec.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c index c85321a..3a61e51 100644 --- a/exec.c +++ b/exec.c @@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ void cpu_exec_init(CPUArchState *env) cpu_index++; } cpu->cpu_index = cpu_index; - cpu->numa_node = 0; QTAILQ_INIT(&cpu->breakpoints); QTAILQ_INIT(&cpu->watchpoints); #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY -- 2.1.0