* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope.
@ 2015-04-21 8:26 Gal Hammer
2015-04-21 9:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-04-21 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gal Hammer @ 2015-04-21 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Gal Hammer, imammedo, mst
A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash.
Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 8d1a761..05c1d34 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
aml_append(ssdt, scope);
}
- sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
+ sb_scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
{
/* create PCI0.PRES device and its _CRS to reserve CPU hotplug MMIO */
dev = aml_device("PCI0." stringify(CPU_HOTPLUG_RESOURCE_DEVICE));
diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
index 48afb72..cb80f2a 100644
--- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
+++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void free_aml_allocator(void);
* Joins Aml elements together and helps to construct AML tables
* Examle of usage:
* Aml *table = aml_def_block("SSDT", ...);
- * Aml *sb = aml_scope("\_SB");
+ * Aml *sb = aml_scope("\\_SB");
* Aml *dev = aml_device("PCI0");
*
* aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope.
2015-04-21 8:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope Gal Hammer
@ 2015-04-21 9:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-04-21 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Igor Mammedov @ 2015-04-21 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gal Hammer; +Cc: qemu-devel, mst
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:26:12 +0300
Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com> wrote:
> A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
> include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 8d1a761..05c1d34 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> aml_append(ssdt, scope);
> }
>
> - sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
> + sb_scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> {
> /* create PCI0.PRES device and its _CRS to reserve CPU hotplug MMIO */
> dev = aml_device("PCI0." stringify(CPU_HOTPLUG_RESOURCE_DEVICE));
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index 48afb72..cb80f2a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void free_aml_allocator(void);
> * Joins Aml elements together and helps to construct AML tables
> * Examle of usage:
> * Aml *table = aml_def_block("SSDT", ...);
> - * Aml *sb = aml_scope("\_SB");
> + * Aml *sb = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> * Aml *dev = aml_device("PCI0");
> *
> * aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope.
2015-04-21 8:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope Gal Hammer
2015-04-21 9:38 ` Igor Mammedov
@ 2015-04-21 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-21 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2015-04-21 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gal Hammer; +Cc: imammedo, qemu-devel
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26:12AM +0300, Gal Hammer wrote:
> A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
s/precede/preceded/
This is correct, but do we need this in 2.3?
I'm split on this. Thoughts?
If yes, commit log needs better explanation on what
the effect on guests is.
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
> include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 8d1a761..05c1d34 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> aml_append(ssdt, scope);
> }
>
> - sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
> + sb_scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> {
> /* create PCI0.PRES device and its _CRS to reserve CPU hotplug MMIO */
> dev = aml_device("PCI0." stringify(CPU_HOTPLUG_RESOURCE_DEVICE));
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index 48afb72..cb80f2a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void free_aml_allocator(void);
> * Joins Aml elements together and helps to construct AML tables
> * Examle of usage:
> * Aml *table = aml_def_block("SSDT", ...);
> - * Aml *sb = aml_scope("\_SB");
> + * Aml *sb = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> * Aml *dev = aml_device("PCI0");
> *
> * aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
> --
> 2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope.
2015-04-21 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2015-04-21 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
2015-04-21 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-04-21 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Gal Hammer, Igor Mammedov, QEMU Developers
On 21 April 2015 at 11:09, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26:12AM +0300, Gal Hammer wrote:
>> A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
>
> s/precede/preceded/
>
> This is correct, but do we need this in 2.3?
> I'm split on this. Thoughts?
> If yes, commit log needs better explanation on what
> the effect on guests is.
Unless the effect is absolutely catastrophic you've missed
the boat for 2.3, and should settle for 2.4 + cc:stable.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope.
2015-04-21 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-04-21 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-22 6:13 ` Igor Mammedov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2015-04-21 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Gal Hammer, Igor Mammedov, QEMU Developers
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:33:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 April 2015 at 11:09, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26:12AM +0300, Gal Hammer wrote:
> >> A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
> >
> > s/precede/preceded/
> >
> > This is correct, but do we need this in 2.3?
> > I'm split on this. Thoughts?
> > If yes, commit log needs better explanation on what
> > the effect on guests is.
>
> Unless the effect is absolutely catastrophic you've missed
> the boat for 2.3, and should settle for 2.4 + cc:stable.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
I rechecked a bunch of guests and they all seem to behave identically
with and without the patch.
2.4 it is.
Thanks.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope.
2015-04-21 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2015-04-22 6:13 ` Igor Mammedov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Igor Mammedov @ 2015-04-22 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Gal Hammer, Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:53:54 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:33:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 21 April 2015 at 11:09, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26:12AM +0300, Gal Hammer wrote:
> > >> A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > s/precede/preceded/
> > >
> > > This is correct, but do we need this in 2.3?
> > > I'm split on this. Thoughts?
> > > If yes, commit log needs better explanation on what
> > > the effect on guests is.
> >
> > Unless the effect is absolutely catastrophic you've missed
> > the boat for 2.3, and should settle for 2.4 + cc:stable.
> >
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
>
> I rechecked a bunch of guests and they all seem to behave identically
> with and without the patch.
> 2.4 it is.
Yep, it's cosmetic change, since that _SB was at the top level it's automatically
attributed to root scope. Having explicit root in name doesn't hurt though
and makes it consistent with other _SB declarations in the code.
>
> Thanks.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-22 6:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-21 8:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope Gal Hammer
2015-04-21 9:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-04-21 10:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-21 11:33 ` Peter Maydell
2015-04-21 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-04-22 6:13 ` Igor Mammedov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).