From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmpCx-0008JY-1H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:00:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmpCv-0007WA-WE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:00:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmpCv-0007W1-P2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:00:45 -0400 From: Eduardo Habkost Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:00:31 -0300 Message-Id: <1430164833-21006-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1430164833-21006-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <1430164833-21006-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] cpu: No need to zero-initialize numa_node List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Igor Mammedov QOM objects are already zero-filled when instantiated, there's no need to explicitly set numa_node to 0. Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- exec.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c index 874ecfc..3566d8f 100644 --- a/exec.c +++ b/exec.c @@ -545,7 +545,6 @@ void cpu_exec_init(CPUArchState *env) cpu_index++; } cpu->cpu_index = cpu_index; - cpu->numa_node = 0; QTAILQ_INIT(&cpu->breakpoints); QTAILQ_INIT(&cpu->watchpoints); #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY -- 2.1.0