From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/3] block: Fix unaligned bdrv_aio_write_zeroes
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:09:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431410972-13087-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> (raw)
An unaligned zero write causes NULL deferencing in bdrv_co_do_pwritev. That
path is reachable from bdrv_co_write_zeroes and bdrv_aio_write_zeroes.
You can easily trigger through the former with qemu-io, as the test case added
by 61815d6e0aa. For bdrv_aio_write_zeroes, in common cases there's always a
format driver (which uses 512 alignment), so it would be much rarer to have
unaligned requests (only concerning top level here, when the request goes down
to bs->file, where for example the alignment is 4k, it would then be calling
bdrv_co_write_zeroes because it's in a coroutine).
fc3959e4669a1c fixed bdrv_co_write_zeroes but not bdrv_aio_write_zeroes. The
lattern is the actually used one by device model. Revert the previous fix, do
it in bdrv_co_do_pwritev, to cover both paths.
v6: Split the function to make it easier to reason. (Stefan)
Add rev-by in 1, 3. (Stefan)
v5: Rebase on to the block/io.c split. (Kevin)
v4: "if (!qiov)" -> "if (!qiov && bytes >= align)". (Paolo)
v3: Fix the case where the unaligned request is contained within the first
block. (Paolo)
Also update iotests 033 to cover the code path with qemu-io.
v2: Split to three aligned pwritev.
Fam Zheng (3):
Revert "block: Fix unaligned zero write"
block: Fix NULL deference for unaligned write if qiov is NULL
qemu-iotests: Test unaligned sub-block zero write
block/io.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
tests/qemu-iotests/033 | 13 +++++
tests/qemu-iotests/033.out | 30 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 6:09 Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-05-12 6:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 1/3] Revert "block: Fix unaligned zero write" Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 11:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-12 6:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/3] block: Fix NULL deference for unaligned write if qiov is NULL Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 11:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-13 5:03 ` Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 12:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-13 5:03 ` Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 6:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/3] qemu-iotests: Test unaligned sub-block zero write Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 11:54 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431410972-13087-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).