qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/3] block: Fix unaligned bdrv_aio_write_zeroes
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:11:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431522721-3266-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> (raw)

v7: Add Kevin's rev-by in patch 1 and 3.
    Address Stefan's and Kevin's comments on patch 2:
    - Don't duplicate tracked_request_begin and tracked_request_end;
    - Don't forget to remove debug printf;
    - Call qemu_vfree unconditionally;
    - Don't serialize aligned part of the zero write req;

An unaligned zero write causes NULL deferencing in bdrv_co_do_pwritev. That
path is reachable from bdrv_co_write_zeroes and bdrv_aio_write_zeroes.

You can easily trigger through the former with qemu-io, as the test case added
by 61815d6e0aa. For bdrv_aio_write_zeroes, in common cases there's always a
format driver (which uses 512 alignment), so it would be much rarer to have
unaligned requests (only concerning top level here, when the request goes down
to bs->file, where for example the alignment is 4k, it would then be calling
bdrv_co_write_zeroes because it's in a coroutine).

fc3959e4669a1c fixed bdrv_co_write_zeroes but not bdrv_aio_write_zeroes.  The
lattern is the actually used one by device model. Revert the previous fix, do
it in bdrv_co_do_pwritev, to cover both paths.



Fam Zheng (3):
  Revert "block: Fix unaligned zero write"
  block: Fix NULL deference for unaligned write if qiov is NULL
  qemu-iotests: Test unaligned sub-block zero write

 block/io.c                 | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 tests/qemu-iotests/033     |  13 +++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/033.out |  30 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
2.4.0

             reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13 13:11 Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-05-13 13:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/3] Revert "block: Fix unaligned zero write" Fam Zheng
2015-05-13 13:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/3] block: Fix NULL deference for unaligned write if qiov is NULL Fam Zheng
2015-05-18 10:00   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-13 13:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/3] qemu-iotests: Test unaligned sub-block zero write Fam Zheng
2015-05-18 10:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/3] block: Fix unaligned bdrv_aio_write_zeroes Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-18 10:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1431522721-3266-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).