From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yvjlz-0005iQ-BQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:01:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yvjlr-0004C4-PZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:01:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yvjlr-00048E-ID for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:01:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1432288894.12533.43.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 12:01:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <555C73AB.2090408@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <5541B728.8020404@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <555C73AB.2090408@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ABNT2 keys again List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-devel On Mi, 2015-05-20 at 14:44 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > A (friendly) ping? :) > > > The solution appears to be trivial (see also some background > > at http://blog.nielshorn.net/2011/03/qemu-and-brazilian-keyboards/ ), > > but the problem is definitely still here. > > > > Maybe it's a time to address this finally? :) > > > > I don't pretend to understand any significant bit of input > > handling, so am asking people who are more knowlegeable in > > this area to take a look ;) Anyone having such a keyboard and willing to run some tests? thanks, Gerd