From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, wangxiaolong@ucloud.cn
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 1/8] block: Add bdrv_get_block_status_above
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:29:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432790990-25383-2-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432790990-25383-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
Like bdrv_is_allocated_above, this function follows the backing chain until seeing
BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED. Base is not included.
Reimplement bdrv_is_allocated on top.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
---
block/io.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
include/block/block.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index e394d92..41463a6 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1560,28 +1560,54 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
return ret;
}
-/* Coroutine wrapper for bdrv_get_block_status() */
-static void coroutine_fn bdrv_get_block_status_co_entry(void *opaque)
+static int64_t coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ BlockDriverState *base,
+ int64_t sector_num,
+ int nb_sectors,
+ int *pnum)
+{
+ BlockDriverState *p;
+ int64_t ret;
+
+ assert(bs != base);
+ for (p = bs; p != base; p = p->backing_hd) {
+ ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(p, sector_num, nb_sectors, pnum);
+ if (ret < 0 || ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED) {
+ break;
+ }
+ /* [sector_num, pnum] unallocated on this layer, which could be only
+ * the first part of [sector_num, nb_sectors]. */
+ nb_sectors = MIN(nb_sectors, *pnum);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* Coroutine wrapper for bdrv_get_block_status_above() */
+static void coroutine_fn bdrv_get_block_status_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
{
BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData *data = opaque;
- BlockDriverState *bs = data->bs;
- data->ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(bs, data->sector_num, data->nb_sectors,
- data->pnum);
+ data->ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status_above(data->bs, data->base,
+ data->sector_num,
+ data->nb_sectors,
+ data->pnum);
data->done = true;
}
/*
- * Synchronous wrapper around bdrv_co_get_block_status().
+ * Synchronous wrapper around bdrv_co_get_block_status_above().
*
- * See bdrv_co_get_block_status() for details.
+ * See bdrv_co_get_block_status_above() for details.
*/
-int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
- int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
+int64_t bdrv_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ BlockDriverState *base,
+ int64_t sector_num,
+ int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
{
Coroutine *co;
BdrvCoGetBlockStatusData data = {
.bs = bs,
+ .base = base,
.sector_num = sector_num,
.nb_sectors = nb_sectors,
.pnum = pnum,
@@ -1590,11 +1616,11 @@ int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
/* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */
- bdrv_get_block_status_co_entry(&data);
+ bdrv_get_block_status_above_co_entry(&data);
} else {
AioContext *aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
- co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_get_block_status_co_entry);
+ co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_get_block_status_above_co_entry);
qemu_coroutine_enter(co, &data);
while (!data.done) {
aio_poll(aio_context, true);
@@ -1603,6 +1629,14 @@ int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
return data.ret;
}
+int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ int64_t sector_num,
+ int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
+{
+ return bdrv_get_block_status_above(bs, bs->backing_hd,
+ sector_num, nb_sectors, pnum);
+}
+
int coroutine_fn bdrv_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
{
diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
index c1c963e..8a13bed 100644
--- a/include/block/block.h
+++ b/include/block/block.h
@@ -361,6 +361,10 @@ bool bdrv_unallocated_blocks_are_zero(BlockDriverState *bs);
bool bdrv_can_write_zeroes_with_unmap(BlockDriverState *bs);
int64_t bdrv_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int nb_sectors, int *pnum);
+int64_t bdrv_get_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ BlockDriverState *base,
+ int64_t sector_num,
+ int nb_sectors, int *pnum);
int bdrv_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors,
int *pnum);
int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top, BlockDriverState *base,
--
2.4.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 5:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/8] block: Mirror discarded sectors Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 5:29 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-05-28 8:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 1/8] block: Add bdrv_get_block_status_above Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/8] qmp: Add optional bool "unmap" to drive-mirror Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-02 17:28 ` Eric Blake
2015-06-03 7:13 ` Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/8] mirror: Do zero write on target if sectors not allocated Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 4/8] block: Fix dirty bitmap in bdrv_co_discard Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 5/8] block: Remove bdrv_reset_dirty Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 6/8] qemu-iotests: Make block job methods common Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/8] qemu-iotests: Add test case for mirror with unmap Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 8:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 8/8] iotests: Use event_wait in wait_ready Fam Zheng
2015-05-28 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-02 16:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v6 0/8] block: Mirror discarded sectors Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432790990-25383-2-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=wangxiaolong@ucloud.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).