qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lersek@redhat.com
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] i386/acpi-build: more traditional _UID and _HID for PXB root buses
Date: Sat,  6 Jun 2015 01:46:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433547989-7238-2-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433547989-7238-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com>

The ACPI specification permits the _HID and _UID objects to evaluate to
strings. (See "6.1.5 _HID (Hardware ID)" and "6.1.12 _UID (Unique ID)" in
the ACPI v6.0 spec.)

With regard to related standards, the UEFI specification can also express
a device address composed from string _HID and _UID identifiers, inside
the Expanded ACPI Device Path Node. (See "9.3.3 ACPI Device Path", Table
49, in the UEFI v2.5 spec.)

However, numeric (integer) contents for both _HID and _UID are more
traditional. They are recommended by the UEFI spec for size reasons:

  [...] the ACPI Device Path node is smaller and should be used if
  possible to reduce the size of device paths that may potentially be
  stored in nonvolatile storage [...]

External tools support them better (for example the --acpi_hid and
--acpi_uid options of "efibootmgr" only take numeric identifiers).
Finally, numeric _HID and _UID contents are existing practice in the QEMU
source.

This patch was tested with a Fedora 20 LiveCD and a preexistent Windows
Server 2012 R2 guest. Using "acpidump" and "iasl" in the Fedora guest, we
get, in the SSDT:

> Scope (\_SB)
> {
>   Device (PC04)
>   {
>     Name (_UID, 0x04)  // _UID: Unique ID
>     Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0A03") /* PCI Bus */)  // _HID: Hardware ID

Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
 hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 5593e41..52c2591 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -945,9 +945,8 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
 
             scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
             dev = aml_device("PC%.02X", bus_num);
-            aml_append(dev,
-                       aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("PC%.02X", bus_num)));
-            aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("PNP0A03")));
+            aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(bus_num)));
+            aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
             aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(bus_num)));
 
             if (numa_node != NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED) {
-- 
1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-05 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 23:45 [Qemu-devel] PXB fixes for QEMU, and extra root buses for OVMF Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-05 23:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] PXB tweaks and fixes Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-05 23:46   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2015-06-10  9:16     ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] i386/acpi-build: more traditional _UID and _HID for PXB root buses Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-05 23:46   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] i386/acpi-build: fix PXB workarounds for unsupported BIOSes Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-10  9:17     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-05 23:46   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] hw/pci: allow the caller of pci_bar_address() to ignore command register Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-05 23:46   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] i386/acpi-build: build_crs(): fetch BAR from PCI config space directly Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-07  9:23     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-06-08  7:56       ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-08  9:40         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-06-09 20:34       ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-10 10:06         ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-10 11:07           ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-10 16:21             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-06-10 16:19         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-06-10  9:09 ` [Qemu-devel] PXB fixes for QEMU, and extra root buses for OVMF Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-10 11:04   ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-06-10 11:55     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-10 12:05       ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433547989-7238-2-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).