From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
famz@redhat.com, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
vsementsov@parallels.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/9] block: incremental backup transactions using BlockJobTxn
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:09:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434103761-29871-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
I stumbled on an idea for a simpler block job transactions implementation.
This series uses patches from John Snow's "[PATCH v6 00/10] block: incremental
backup transactions" series. I wasn't sure if the idea would work, hence this
RFC instead of asking John to spend his time chasing the idea.
This series solves the problem at the blockjob level instead of in qmp
'transaction'. This way no callbacks need to be intercepted and refcounts
don't need to be added to existing objects.
The advantage is this approach only requires small changes to blockdev.c and
block/backup.c. The logic is encapsulated in the BlockJobTxn object, keeping
the transaction behavior isolated and easy to maintain.
Recap: motivation for block job transactions
--------------------------------------------
If an incremental backup block job fails then we reclaim the bitmap so
the job can be retried. The problem comes when multiple jobs are started as
part of a qmp 'transaction' command. We need to group these jobs in a
transaction so that either all jobs complete successfully or all bitmaps are
reclaimed.
Without transactions, there is a case where some jobs complete successfully and
throw away their bitmaps, making it impossible to retry the backup by rerunning
the command if one of the jobs fails.
How does this implementation work?
----------------------------------
These patches add a BlockJobTxn object with the following API:
txn = block_job_txn_new();
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job1);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job2);
block_job_txn_begin();
The jobs either both complete successfully or they both fail/cancel. If the
user cancels job1 then job2 will also be cancelled and vice versa.
Jobs stay alive waiting for other jobs to complete. They can be cancelled by
the user during this time. Job blockers are still in effect and no other block
job can run on this device in the meantime (since QEMU currently only allows 1
job per device). This is the main drawback to this approach but reasonable
since you probably don't want to run other jobs/operations until you're sure
the backup was successful (you won't be able to retry a failed backup if
there's a new job running).
Adding transaction support to the backup job is very easy. It just needs to
make a call before throwing away the bitmap and returning from its coroutine:
block_job_txn_prepare_to_complete(job->txn, job, ret);
if (job->sync_bitmap) {
BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm;
if (ret < 0 || block_job_is_cancelled(&job->common)) {
...
John Snow (4):
qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations
iotests: add transactional incremental backup test
block: rename BlkTransactionState and BdrvActionOps
iotests: 124 - transactional failure test
Kashyap Chamarthy (1):
qmp-commands.hx: Update the supported 'transaction' operations
Stefan Hajnoczi (4):
block: keep bitmap if incremental backup job is cancelled
block: add block job transactions
blockdev: make BlockJobTxn available to qmp 'transaction'
block/backup: support block job transactions
block.c | 19 ++-
block/backup.c | 9 +-
blockdev.c | 298 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
blockjob.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/bitmaps.md | 6 +-
include/block/block.h | 2 +-
include/block/block_int.h | 6 +-
include/block/blockjob.h | 49 ++++++++
qapi-schema.json | 6 +-
qmp-commands.hx | 21 +++-
tests/qemu-iotests/124 | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tests/qemu-iotests/124.out | 4 +-
trace-events | 4 +
13 files changed, 679 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
--
2.4.2
next reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 10:09 Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/9] qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/9] iotests: add transactional incremental backup test Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 3/9] block: rename BlkTransactionState and BdrvActionOps Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/9] block: keep bitmap if incremental backup job is cancelled Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 22:39 ` John Snow
2015-06-15 14:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-24 17:35 ` Max Reitz
2015-06-25 12:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 5/9] block: add block job transactions Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-24 18:37 ` Max Reitz
2015-06-25 12:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 6/9] blockdev: make BlockJobTxn available to qmp 'transaction' Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 7/9] block/backup: support block job transactions Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 8/9] iotests: 124 - transactional failure test Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-12 10:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 9/9] qmp-commands.hx: Update the supported 'transaction' operations Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434103761-29871-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).