From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7MDN-0005Mw-Bk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:18:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7MDK-0002y4-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:18:05 -0400 Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.112]:35718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7MDJ-0002xt-MU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:18:01 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:18:00 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9D517D8062 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:18:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.247]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t5NBHdiv35913954 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:17:39 GMT Received: from d06av12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t5NBHdOw017782 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 05:17:39 -0600 From: Cornelia Huck Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:17:32 +0200 Message-Id: <1435058256-11838-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] virtio-ccw: virtio-1 enablement List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: mst@redhat.com Cc: Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Michael, here's the virtio-ccw patches that Gerd had dropped due to conflicts during his virtio-1 rebase. Patch 2 has been updated with my changes to ensure big endian accesses (which was a separate patch before). There might be more patches that were in my tree but are not yet upstream, but I'm still digging myself out from under the post-vacation email pile. I think these can still go into 2.4. Would you take them through your tree, or should I take them through the s390x tree? Cornelia Huck (2): s390x/virtio-ccw: support virtio-1 set_vq format s390x/virtio-ccw: enable virtio 1.0 Thomas Huth (2): s390x/css: Add a callback for when subchannel gets disabled s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call hw/s390x/css.c | 12 +++ hw/s390x/css.h | 1 + hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 8 ++ 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) -- 2.3.8