From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46353)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.williamson@redhat.com>) id 1Z8Wm8-0001En-7k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:46:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.williamson@redhat.com>) id 1Z8Wm7-0001Mh-Ca
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:46:48 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52547)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.williamson@redhat.com>) id 1Z8Wm7-0001MX-88
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:46:47 -0400
Message-ID: <1435337205.3700.450.camel@redhat.com>
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:46:45 -0600
In-Reply-To: <558D7E63.7000005@linaro.org>
References: <1434386038-9246-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
	<1434386038-9246-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
	<1435335678.3700.433.camel@redhat.com> <558D7D31.1010009@redhat.com>
	<558D7E63.7000005@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH v16 6/6] hw/vfio/platform: add irqfd
	support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
Cc: b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, eric.auger@st.com, vikrams@codeaurora.org, patches@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, christoffer.dall@linaro.org

On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 18:31 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 06/26/2015 06:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 26/06/2015 18:21, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> >>>> +    if (kvm_irqfds_enabled() && kvm_resamplefds_enabled() &&
> >>>> +        vdev->irqfd_allowed) {
> >>>> +        sbc->connect_irq_notifier = vfio_start_irqfd_injection;
> >> Should we be abstracting this to a
> >> sysbus_register_connect_irq_notifier()?  It seems a littler personal to
> >> be reaching in and setting it ourselves and would avoid us needing to
> >> reference the class.
> > 
> > It's your class, so it's not too bad to touch it from that point of
> > view; on the other hand it's ugly to do it here nevertheless. :)
> > 
> > I think you should always set "sbc->connect_irq_notifier =
> > vfio_start_irqfd_injection" in the class_init function.  The
> > vfio_start_irqfd_injection function can just exit if it finds
> > "!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_irqfds_enabled() || !kvm_resamplefds_enabled()
> > || !vdev->irqfd_allowed".
> OK thanks for the guidance. Alex, are you OK with that solution. It
> avoids touching the other patch

Yeah, I'm ok with that, it's less awkward from the class_init.  Thanks,

Alex