From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
famz@redhat.com, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
mreitz@redhat.com, vsementsov@parallels.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] block: incremental backup transactions using BlockJobTxn
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:24:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436192669-10062-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
v2:
Patch 5:
* Set txn pointer to NULL in block_job_txn_begin() [jsnow]
* Rename block_job_txn_job_done to block_job_txn_job_done [jsnow]
* Rename block_job_txn_complete to block_job_txn_kick [jsnow]
* Add BLOCK_JOB_TXN_CANCEL_PENDING to solve race condition on cancel [jsnow]
* Document when txn may be NULL
Patch 7:
* Convert blockdev-backup in addition to drive-backup
* Add 'transactional-cancel' argument so users can enable/disable
transactional behavior. This preserves semantics for existing users
and allows fine-grained control over when to use transaction
semantics. [jsnow]
Patch 10:
* Test fail/cancel race condition [jsnow]
* Use new 'transactional-cancel' QMP argument
This series uses patches from John Snow's "[PATCH v6 00/10] block: incremental
backup transactions" series but implements the feature with a new transaction
mechanism for blockjobs called BlockJobTxn.
Recap: motivation for block job transactions
--------------------------------------------
If an incremental backup block job fails then we reclaim the bitmap so
the job can be retried. The problem comes when multiple jobs are started as
part of a qmp 'transaction' command. We need to group these jobs in a
transaction so that either all jobs complete successfully or all bitmaps are
reclaimed.
Without transactions, there is a case where some jobs complete successfully and
throw away their bitmaps, making it impossible to retry the backup by rerunning
the command if one of the jobs fails.
How does this implementation work?
----------------------------------
These patches add a BlockJobTxn object with the following API:
txn = block_job_txn_new();
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job1);
block_job_txn_add_job(txn, job2);
block_job_txn_begin();
The jobs either both complete successfully or they both fail/cancel. If the
user cancels job1 then job2 will also be cancelled and vice versa.
Jobs stay alive waiting for other jobs to complete. They can be cancelled by
the user during this time. Job blockers are still in effect and no other block
job can run on this device in the meantime (since QEMU currently only allows 1
job per device). This is the main drawback to this approach but reasonable
since you probably don't want to run other jobs/operations until you're sure
the backup was successful (you won't be able to retry a failed backup if
there's a new job running).
Adding transaction support to the backup job is very easy. It just needs to
make a call before throwing away the bitmap and returning from its coroutine:
block_job_txn_job_done(job->txn, job, ret);
if (job->sync_bitmap) {
BdrvDirtyBitmap *bm;
if (ret < 0 || block_job_is_cancelled(&job->common)) {
...
John Snow (4):
qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations
iotests: add transactional incremental backup test
block: rename BlkTransactionState and BdrvActionOps
iotests: 124 - transactional failure test
Kashyap Chamarthy (1):
qmp-commands.hx: Update the supported 'transaction' operations
Stefan Hajnoczi (5):
block: keep bitmap if incremental backup job is cancelled
block: add block job transactions
blockdev: make BlockJobTxn available to qmp 'transaction'
block/backup: support block job transactions
tests: add BlockJobTxn unit test
block.c | 19 ++-
block/backup.c | 7 +-
blockdev.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
blockjob.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/bitmaps.md | 6 +-
hmp.c | 2 +-
include/block/block.h | 2 +-
include/block/block_int.h | 6 +-
include/block/blockjob.h | 52 +++++++
qapi-schema.json | 6 +-
qapi/block-core.json | 14 +-
qmp-commands.hx | 21 ++-
tests/Makefile | 3 +
tests/qemu-iotests/124 | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
tests/qemu-iotests/124.out | 4 +-
tests/test-blockjob-txn.c | 233 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
trace-events | 4 +
17 files changed, 1022 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/test-blockjob-txn.c
--
2.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 14:24 Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] iotests: add transactional incremental backup test Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-07 6:48 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/10] block: rename BlkTransactionState and BdrvActionOps Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-07 6:50 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/10] block: keep bitmap if incremental backup job is cancelled Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-07 6:51 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/10] block: add block job transactions Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-07 7:32 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-07 12:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-08 1:59 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-08 13:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/10] blockdev: make BlockJobTxn available to qmp 'transaction' Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] block/backup: support block job transactions Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/10] iotests: 124 - transactional failure test Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/10] qmp-commands.hx: Update the supported 'transaction' operations Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-06 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/10] tests: add BlockJobTxn unit test Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436192669-10062-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).