qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, jani.kokkonen@huawei.com,
	tech@virtualopensystems.com, claudio.fontana@huawei.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 13/13] softmmu_template.h: move to multithreading
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:23:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436516626-8322-14-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436516626-8322-1-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>

Exploiting the tcg_excl_access_lock, port the helper_{le,be}_st_name to
work in real multithreading.

- The macro lookup_cpus_ll_addr now uses directly the
  env->excl_protected_addr to invalidate others' LL/SC operations

Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen <jani.kokkonen@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
---
 softmmu_template.h | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/softmmu_template.h b/softmmu_template.h
index bc767f6..522454f 100644
--- a/softmmu_template.h
+++ b/softmmu_template.h
@@ -141,21 +141,24 @@
     vidx >= 0;                                                                \
 })
 
+#define EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR ULLONG_MAX
+
+/* This macro requires the caller to have the tcg_excl_access_lock lock since
+ * it modifies the excl_protected_hwaddr of a running vCPU.
+ * The macros scans all the excl_protected_hwaddr of all the vCPUs and compare
+ * them with the address the current vCPU is writing to. If there is a match,
+ * we reset the value, making the SC fail. */
 #define lookup_cpus_ll_addr(addr)                                             \
 ({                                                                            \
     CPUState *cpu;                                                            \
     CPUArchState *acpu;                                                       \
-    bool hit = false;                                                         \
                                                                               \
     CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {                                                        \
         acpu = (CPUArchState *)cpu->env_ptr;                                  \
         if (cpu != current_cpu && acpu->excl_protected_hwaddr == addr) {      \
-            hit = true;                                                       \
-            break;                                                            \
+            acpu->excl_protected_hwaddr = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;               \
         }                                                                     \
     }                                                                         \
-                                                                              \
-    hit;                                                                      \
 })
 
 #ifndef SOFTMMU_CODE_ACCESS
@@ -439,18 +442,52 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, DATA_TYPE val,
              * exclusive-protected memory. */
             hwaddr hw_addr = (iotlbentry->addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + addr;
 
-            bool set_to_dirty;
-
             /* Two cases of invalidation: the current vCPU is writing to another
              * vCPU's exclusive address or the vCPU that issued the LoadLink is
              * writing to it, but not through a StoreCond. */
-            set_to_dirty = lookup_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr);
-            set_to_dirty |= env->ll_sc_context &&
-                           (env->excl_protected_hwaddr == hw_addr);
+            qemu_mutex_lock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+
+            /* The macro lookup_cpus_ll_addr could have reset the exclusive
+             * address. Fail the SC in this case.
+             * N.B.: Here excl_succeeded == 0 means that we don't come from a
+             * store conditional.  */
+            if (env->excl_succeeded &&
+                        (env->excl_protected_hwaddr == EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR)) {
+                env->excl_succeeded = 0;
+                qemu_mutex_unlock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+
+                return;
+            }
+
+            lookup_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr);
+
+            if (!env->excl_succeeded) {
+                if (env->ll_sc_context &&
+                            (env->excl_protected_hwaddr == hw_addr)) {
+                    cpu_physical_memory_set_excl_dirty(hw_addr);
+                }
+            } else {
+                if (cpu_physical_memory_excl_is_dirty(hw_addr) ||
+                        env->excl_protected_hwaddr != hw_addr) {
+                    env->excl_protected_hwaddr = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+                    qemu_mutex_unlock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+                    env->excl_succeeded = 0;
+
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+
+            haddr = addr + env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addend;
+        #if DATA_SIZE == 1
+            glue(glue(st, SUFFIX), _p)((uint8_t *)haddr, val);
+        #else
+            glue(glue(st, SUFFIX), _le_p)((uint8_t *)haddr, val);
+        #endif
+
+            env->excl_protected_hwaddr = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+            qemu_mutex_unlock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
 
-            if (set_to_dirty) {
-                cpu_physical_memory_set_excl_dirty(hw_addr);
-            } /* the vCPU is legitimately writing to the protected address */
+            return;
         } else {
             if ((addr & (DATA_SIZE - 1)) != 0) {
                 goto do_unaligned_access;
@@ -537,18 +574,49 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong addr, DATA_TYPE val,
              * exclusive-protected memory. */
             hwaddr hw_addr = (iotlbentry->addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + addr;
 
-            bool set_to_dirty;
-
             /* Two cases of invalidation: the current vCPU is writing to another
              * vCPU's exclusive address or the vCPU that issued the LoadLink is
              * writing to it, but not through a StoreCond. */
-            set_to_dirty = lookup_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr);
-            set_to_dirty |= env->ll_sc_context &&
-                           (env->excl_protected_hwaddr == hw_addr);
+            qemu_mutex_lock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+
+            /* The macro lookup_cpus_ll_addr could have reset the exclusive
+             * address. Fail the SC in this case.
+             * N.B.: Here excl_succeeded == 0 means that we don't come from a
+             * store conditional.  */
+            if (env->excl_succeeded &&
+                        (env->excl_protected_hwaddr == EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR)) {
+                env->excl_succeeded = 0;
+                qemu_mutex_unlock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+
+                return;
+            }
+
+            lookup_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr);
+
+            if (!env->excl_succeeded) {
+                if (env->ll_sc_context &&
+                            (env->excl_protected_hwaddr == hw_addr)) {
+                    cpu_physical_memory_set_excl_dirty(hw_addr);
+                }
+            } else {
+                if (cpu_physical_memory_excl_is_dirty(hw_addr) ||
+                        env->excl_protected_hwaddr != hw_addr) {
+                    env->excl_protected_hwaddr = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+                    qemu_mutex_unlock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+                    env->excl_succeeded = 0;
+
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
 
-            if (set_to_dirty) {
-                cpu_physical_memory_set_excl_dirty(hw_addr);
-            } /* the vCPU is legitimately writing to the protected address */
+            haddr = addr + env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addend;
+
+            glue(glue(st, SUFFIX), _be_p)((uint8_t *)haddr, val);
+
+            qemu_mutex_unlock(&tcg_excl_access_lock);
+            env->excl_protected_hwaddr = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+
+            return;
         } else {
             if ((addr & (DATA_SIZE - 1)) != 0) {
                 goto do_unaligned_access;
-- 
2.4.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-10  8:23 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 00/13] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation Alvise Rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 01/13] exec: Add new exclusive bitmap to ram_list Alvise Rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 02/13] cputlb: Add new TLB_EXCL flag Alvise Rigo
2015-07-16 14:32   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-16 15:04     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 03/13] softmmu: Add helpers for a new slow-path Alvise Rigo
2015-07-16 14:53   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-16 15:15     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 04/13] tcg-op: create new TCG qemu_ldlink and qemu_stcond instructions Alvise Rigo
2015-07-17  9:49   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-17 10:05     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 05/13] target-arm: translate: implement qemu_ldlink and qemu_stcond ops Alvise Rigo
2015-07-17 12:51   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-17 13:01     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 06/13] target-i386: " Alvise Rigo
2015-07-17 12:56   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-17 13:27     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 07/13] ram_addr.h: Make exclusive bitmap accessors atomic Alvise Rigo
2015-07-17 13:32   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 08/13] exec.c: introduce a simple rendezvous support Alvise Rigo
2015-07-17 13:45   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-17 13:54     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 09/13] cpus.c: introduce simple callback support Alvise Rigo
2015-07-10  9:36   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-10  9:47     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  9:53       ` Frederic Konrad
2015-07-10 10:06         ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10 10:24       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-10 12:16         ` Frederic Konrad
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 10/13] Simple TLB flush wrap to use as exit callback Alvise Rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 11/13] Introduce exit_flush_req and tcg_excl_access_lock Alvise Rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 12/13] softmmu_llsc_template.h: move to multithreading Alvise Rigo
2015-07-17 15:27   ` Alex Bennée
2015-07-17 15:31     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:23 ` Alvise Rigo [this message]
2015-07-17 15:57   ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 13/13] softmmu_template.h: " Alex Bennée
2015-07-17 16:19     ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 00/13] Slow-path for atomic instruction translation Mark Burton
2015-07-10  8:58   ` alvise rigo
2015-07-10  8:39 ` Frederic Konrad
2015-07-10  9:04   ` alvise rigo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436516626-8322-14-git-send-email-a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com \
    --to=a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=claudio.fontana@huawei.com \
    --cc=jani.kokkonen@huawei.com \
    --cc=mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tech@virtualopensystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).