From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIhW6-0004O6-QX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:16:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIhW6-0001iS-1a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:16:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIhW5-0001iJ-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:16:17 -0400 From: Laszlo Ersek Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:16:02 +0200 Message-Id: <1437761762-19798-4-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1437761762-19798-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> References: <1437761762-19798-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.4-rc3 3/3] target-i386: wake up processors that receive an SMI List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Andreas Faerber , Eduardo Habkost , Richard Henderson From: Paolo Bonzini An SMI should definitely wake up a processor in halted state! This lets OVMF boot with SMM on multiprocessor systems, although it halts very soon after that with a "CpuIndex != BspIndex" assertion failure. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Andreas Faerber Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Richard Henderson Cc: Eduardo Habkost Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek --- target-i386/cpu.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c index 7a779b1..ee7b4ac 100644 --- a/target-i386/cpu.c +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c @@ -3134,6 +3134,7 @@ static bool x86_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs) return ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) && (env->eflags & IF_MASK)) || (cs->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI | + CPU_INTERRUPT_SMI | CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT | CPU_INTERRUPT_SIPI | CPU_INTERRUPT_MCE)) || -- 1.8.3.1