qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Xiao Guangrong" <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem/x86: add processor address space check for VM memory
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:33:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <143a437c-be99-d6d8-732f-e9544e2d9b35@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41A3B19D-87B7-4FD6-A5C7-17D758B2DB37@redhat.com>

>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * The 64bit pci hole starts after "above 4G RAM" and
>>>> * potentially the space reserved for memory hotplug.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> There is the
>>>> 	ROUND_UP(hole64_start, 1 * GiB);
>>>> in there that is not really required for the !hole64 case. It
>>>> shouldn't matter much in practice I think (besides an aligned value
>>>> showing up in the error message).
>>>>
>>>> We could factor out most of that calculation into a
>>>> separate function, skipping that alignment to make that
>>>> clearer.
>>> Yeah this whole memory segmentation is quite complicated and might benefit from a qemu doc or a refactoring.
>>
>> Absolutely. Do you have time to work on that (including the updated fix?).
> 
> Other than the fix you proposed I am not sure if we need to fix anything else atm. Seems physical address space bound checks are already in place.
> Re: doc, maybe. I will add it to my TODO list.

Will you send a proper patch, ideally not using pc_pci_hole64_start() 
but instead the same logic without the final alignment to 1 GiB?

I can also do it, but might take a bit longer.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-18  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-08  9:50 [PATCH] mem/x86: add processor address space check for VM memory Ani Sinha
2023-09-08 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-08 14:12   ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-08 14:16     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-08 15:13       ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-08 16:02         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-08 16:04           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-12 10:41           ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-12 15:34             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-14  5:53               ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-14  8:37                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-14 11:21                   ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-14 11:49                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-15 10:38                       ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18  9:33                         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-09-18 10:07                           ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18 10:09                             ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-18 10:11                               ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18 10:14                                 ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18 10:19                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-18 10:54                                   ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18 10:58                                     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-18 11:00                                       ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18 11:02                                         ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-18 11:02                                         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-18 11:04                                           ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-14 17:11                   ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-16  5:17                   ` Ani Sinha
2023-09-08 16:04         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=143a437c-be99-d6d8-732f-e9544e2d9b35@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).