From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E16C433EF for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161C960235 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:12:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 161C960235 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen0n.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52592 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPRg-0003Yd-9k for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:12:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPPi-0001rG-OS; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:10:49 -0400 Received: from mail.xen0n.name ([115.28.160.31]:41318 helo=mailbox.box.xen0n.name) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdPPe-000343-KV; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:10:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.9.172] (unknown [101.88.135.223]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailbox.box.xen0n.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36FE1600B5; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:10:36 +0800 (CST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=xen0n.name; s=mail; t=1634789436; bh=X2wQd5Wt89WN/JfZ9I/2SoZGdFwLNv9dFoddkRYoTjk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=I4MEvyHAuNavD2mEEZrBzrURNf17xAFbETxvY/MDyUZPAN4EvP6zcYT/IZ4SyWHs0 9+CgbmG9rhFXG16w69InWxGzaA905XEODNPze+D4YcBSVL4NdUwXMb0EIEUeaLy0O9 KQK/XyqcevV7HFjuHvBIk/fI1zU0tnQCGlM9UkN0= Message-ID: <143c6683-a84e-c3b3-ab67-33db648c6c0f@xen0n.name> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:10:35 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/95.0a1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/21] target/loongarch: Add core definition Content-Language: en-US To: Song Gao , Richard Henderson , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, karl@freefriends.org References: <1634561247-25499-1-git-send-email-gaosong@loongson.cn> <1634561247-25499-3-git-send-email-gaosong@loongson.cn> <5d8d1719-c6f3-1de5-b086-298e8379d8b6@xen0n.name> <274b9066-66c1-b246-72c6-35d6791cba0e@amsat.org> <74bbac65-2cd4-dac7-86d1-e18cfa3f3f1f@xen0n.name> <49d356da-30dd-6460-73fa-8a9e165a9091@loongson.cn> From: WANG Xuerui In-Reply-To: <49d356da-30dd-6460-73fa-8a9e165a9091@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=115.28.160.31; envelope-from=i.qemu@xen0n.name; helo=mailbox.box.xen0n.name X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.267, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, thuth@redhat.com, qemu-devel-owner@nongnu.org, yangxiaojuan@loongson.cn, peterx@redhat.com, laurent@vivier.eu, alistair.francis@wdc.com, maobibo@loongson.cn, pbonzini@redhat.com, bmeng.cn@gmail.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, chenhuacai@loongson.cn Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 10/21/21 11:21, Song Gao wrote: > BTW, > Account yangxiaojuan@loongson.cn It seems that she has been blacklisted. Xiaojuan sent 31 e-mails, which were not displayed since the 21st one, people who don't have a CC can't read all the emails,  and xiaojuan reply can't be in qemu-level@nongnu.org. > > > > > Xuerui said: > > "You may address the several review comments then just send v2. This way > the threading is less likely to be damaged (you need to exactly specify > In-Reply-To headers and such for the re-sent patches to correctly link > to this thread, I think it's not worth the effort). " > > I think this will have the same problem. > > Richard and Karl, How can we solve this problem？ You and Xiaojuan seem to be in some kind of close cooperation; for example every patch from you has double Signed-off-by lines. So I suppose you could just switch to the intended branch and `git send-email` for her; proper "From:" lines will be prepended to every mail where Git author differs from git-send-email identity. Just remember not to commit/send blobs next time though. As for the supposed "ban" on Xiaojuan's account, we cannot diagnose this without mailing list owners' help; maybe it was just some kind of automatic temporary ban, or even connectivity problem on Loongson's side.