* [Qemu-devel] QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface @ 2015-08-31 9:08 Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, qemu-devel, seabios Cc: Mark Rutland, Rob Herring, Drew, Arnd Bergmann, devicetree, Stefan Hajnoczi, Alexander Graf, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo Implementation of the FW CFG DMA interface. When running a Linux guest on top of QEMU, using the -kernel options, this is the timing improvement for x86: QEMU commit 090d0bf and SeaBIOS commit 2fc20dc QEMU startup time: .078 BIOS startup time: .060 Kernel setup time: .578 Total time: .716 QEMU with this patch series and SeaBIOS with this patch series QEMU startup time: .080 BIOS startup time: .039 Kernel setup time: .002 Total time: .121 QEMU startup time is the time between the start and the first kvm_entry. BIOS startup time is the time between the first kvm_entry and the start of function do_boot, in SeaBIOS. Kernel setup time is the time between the start of the function do_boot in SeaBIOS and the jump to the Linux kernel. As you can see, both the BIOS (because of ACPI tables and other configurations) and the Linux kernel boot (because of the copy to memory) are greatly improved with this new interface. Also, this new interface is an addon to the old interface. Both interfaces are compatible and interchangeable. Changes from v1: - Take into account order of fields in the FWCfgDmaAccess structure - Check and change endianness of FWCfgDmaAccess fields - Change order of fields in the FWCfgDmaAccess structure - Add FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP feature for control field - Split FW_CFG_SIZE in QEMU - Make FW_CFG_ID a bitmap of features - Add 64 bit address support for the transfer. Trigger when writing the low address, and address is 0 by default and at the end of each transfer. - Align ports and addresses. - Preserve old fw_cfg_comb_valid behaviour in QEMU - Update documentation to reflect all these changes ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] fw_cfg DMA interface 2015-08-31 9:08 [Qemu-devel] QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 ` Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí ` (4 more replies) 0 siblings, 5 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo Implement host-side of the FW CFG DMA interface both for x86 and ARM. Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. Gabriel L. Somlo (1): fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí (4): fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for x86 docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 79 +++++++++++++- hw/arm/virt.c | 13 ++- hw/i386/pc.c | 11 +- hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h | 15 ++- 5 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 ` Marc Marí 2015-09-01 17:33 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Marc Marí ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Gabriel L. Somlo, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Laszlo From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu> Document the behavior of fw_cfg_modify_iXX() for leak-less updating of integer-type blobs. Currently only fw_cfg_modify_i16() is coded, but 32- and 64-bit versions may be added later if necessary.. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> --- docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt index 74351dd..5bc7b96 100644 --- a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt +++ b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt @@ -159,6 +159,17 @@ will convert a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little-endian, then add a dynamically allocated copy of the appropriately sized item to fw_cfg under the given selector key value. +== fw_cfg_modify_iXX() == + +Modify the value of an XX-bit item (where XX may be 16, 32, or 64). +Similarly to the corresponding fw_cfg_add_iXX() function set, convert +a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little endian, create a dynamically +allocated copy of the required size, and replace the existing item at +the given selector key value with the newly allocated one. The previous +item, assumed to have been allocated during an earlier call to +fw_cfg_add_iXX() or fw_cfg_modify_iXX() (of the same width XX), is freed +before the function returns. + == fw_cfg_add_file() == Given a filename (i.e., fw_cfg item name), starting pointer, and size, -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí @ 2015-09-01 17:33 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 17:45 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Gabriel L. Somlo, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Laszlo On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> wrote: > From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu> > > Document the behavior of fw_cfg_modify_iXX() for leak-less updating > of integer-type blobs. > > Currently only fw_cfg_modify_i16() is coded, but 32- and 64-bit versions > may be added later if necessary.. > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > --- > docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > index 74351dd..5bc7b96 100644 > --- a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > +++ b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > @@ -159,6 +159,17 @@ will convert a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little-endian, then add > a dynamically allocated copy of the appropriately sized item to fw_cfg > under the given selector key value. > > +== fw_cfg_modify_iXX() == > + > +Modify the value of an XX-bit item (where XX may be 16, 32, or 64). > +Similarly to the corresponding fw_cfg_add_iXX() function set, convert > +a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little endian, create a dynamically > +allocated copy of the required size, and replace the existing item at > +the given selector key value with the newly allocated one. The previous > +item, assumed to have been allocated during an earlier call to > +fw_cfg_add_iXX() or fw_cfg_modify_iXX() (of the same width XX), is freed > +before the function returns. > + > == fw_cfg_add_file() == > > Given a filename (i.e., fw_cfg item name), starting pointer, and size, This doesn't cover fw_cfg_modify_file(); is that intentional? As an aside, shouldn't this function-level documentation be done via doc-comments in the header file where the prototypes are declared? (You don't need to move the docs around in this series, but it might be nice to do at some point.) thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 17:33 ` Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 17:45 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-01 18:45 ` Peter Maydell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-01 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:33:25PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> wrote: > > From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu> > > > > Document the behavior of fw_cfg_modify_iXX() for leak-less updating > > of integer-type blobs. > > > > Currently only fw_cfg_modify_i16() is coded, but 32- and 64-bit versions > > may be added later if necessary.. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > > --- > > docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 11 +++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > > index 74351dd..5bc7b96 100644 > > --- a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > > +++ b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > > @@ -159,6 +159,17 @@ will convert a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little-endian, then add > > a dynamically allocated copy of the appropriately sized item to fw_cfg > > under the given selector key value. > > > > +== fw_cfg_modify_iXX() == > > + > > +Modify the value of an XX-bit item (where XX may be 16, 32, or 64). > > +Similarly to the corresponding fw_cfg_add_iXX() function set, convert > > +a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little endian, create a dynamically > > +allocated copy of the required size, and replace the existing item at > > +the given selector key value with the newly allocated one. The previous > > +item, assumed to have been allocated during an earlier call to > > +fw_cfg_add_iXX() or fw_cfg_modify_iXX() (of the same width XX), is freed > > +before the function returns. > > + > > == fw_cfg_add_file() == > > > > Given a filename (i.e., fw_cfg item name), starting pointer, and size, > > This doesn't cover fw_cfg_modify_file(); is that intentional? There should already be a paragraph in there (further down from where this is supposed to go in) describing fw_cfg_modify_file(), which isn't affected by this. > > As an aside, shouldn't this function-level documentation be done > via doc-comments in the header file where the prototypes are > declared? (You don't need to move the docs around in this series, > but it might be nice to do at some point.) You mean, leave docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt to deal with the guest-side port/mmio api only, and have the host-side functions simply documented as comments in include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h ? That should be relatively painless, if that's the agreed-upon convention... Thanks, --Gabriel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 17:45 ` Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-01 18:45 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 19:13 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gabriel L. Somlo Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo On 1 September 2015 at 18:45, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:33:25PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> This doesn't cover fw_cfg_modify_file(); is that intentional? > > There should already be a paragraph in there (further down from where > this is supposed to go in) describing fw_cfg_modify_file(), which > isn't affected by this. Sorry, so there is. >> As an aside, shouldn't this function-level documentation be done >> via doc-comments in the header file where the prototypes are >> declared? (You don't need to move the docs around in this series, >> but it might be nice to do at some point.) > > You mean, leave docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt to deal with the guest-side > port/mmio api only, and have the host-side functions simply documented > as comments in include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h ? > > That should be relatively painless, if that's the agreed-upon > convention... Yes. I think at the point this file was written we probably hadn't started using doc-comments for our APIs. (My usual place to crib the formatting for doc-comments is the extract/deposit APIs in bitops.h.) thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 18:45 ` Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 19:13 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-01 20:10 ` Peter Maydell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-01 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:45:27PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 September 2015 at 18:45, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:33:25PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> As an aside, shouldn't this function-level documentation be done > >> via doc-comments in the header file where the prototypes are > >> declared? (You don't need to move the docs around in this series, > >> but it might be nice to do at some point.) > > > > You mean, leave docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt to deal with the guest-side > > port/mmio api only, and have the host-side functions simply documented > > as comments in include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h ? > > > > That should be relatively painless, if that's the agreed-upon > > convention... > > Yes. I think at the point this file was written we probably hadn't > started using doc-comments for our APIs. (My usual place to crib > the formatting for doc-comments is the extract/deposit APIs in > bitops.h.) OK, I guess I'll wait until after the dust settles on fw_cfg/DMA before further mucking with the doc or header files, but again, this shouldn't be too painless... Also, since I'll be tinkering with fw_cfg again, and you mentioned using DT on arm and ACPI on x86 to auto-detect the presence (and location) of fw_cfg from the guest-side in a related thread: Right now, I don't think fw_cfg is listed in ACPI, and I would like it to be. So what should I do, simply figure out how to add a new node somewhere in the SSDT and submit a patch for that ? Could it be that simple, or am I missing something ? :) Thanks, --Gabriel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 19:13 ` Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-01 20:10 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 20:27 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-02 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann 0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gabriel L. Somlo Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo On 1 September 2015 at 20:13, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: > Also, since I'll be tinkering with fw_cfg again, and you mentioned > using DT on arm and ACPI on x86 to auto-detect the presence (and location) > of fw_cfg from the guest-side in a related thread: I meant DT or ACPI on ARM, actually. I don't know what the x86 approach is for fw_cfg but I think it's just "known address". (For ARM we don't I think currently expose fw_cfg in the ACPI tables, but we probably ought to; only needed for the edge case where you actually wanted to read fw_cfg in the guest kernel rather than just the guest firmware, though.) thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 20:10 ` Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 20:27 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-01 20:30 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-02 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-01 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:10:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 September 2015 at 20:13, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: > > Also, since I'll be tinkering with fw_cfg again, and you mentioned > > using DT on arm and ACPI on x86 to auto-detect the presence (and location) > > of fw_cfg from the guest-side in a related thread: > > I meant DT or ACPI on ARM, actually. I don't know what the x86 > approach is for fw_cfg but I think it's just "known address". > (For ARM we don't I think currently expose fw_cfg in the ACPI > tables, but we probably ought to; only needed for the edge > case where you actually wanted to read fw_cfg in the guest > kernel rather than just the guest firmware, though.) Right, that's what I'm trying to do -- expose fw_cfg in /sys/firmware/... on the guest -- which involves figuring out how to determine if it is present (DT on ARM, blindly poking port 0x510 on x86 for now, hence my interest in having it listed in ACPI). Now, if we did expose fw_cfg in ACPI on *both* ARM and x86, I wonder I could get away with an ACPI-only detection scheme across both architectures... But ACPI is all we have on x86, so on the QEMU side of things it looks like I'll have to add it regardless... Thanks, --Gabriel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 20:27 ` Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-01 20:30 ` Peter Maydell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gabriel L. Somlo Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo On 1 September 2015 at 21:27, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: > Right, that's what I'm trying to do -- expose fw_cfg in > /sys/firmware/... on the guest -- which involves figuring out how > to determine if it is present (DT on ARM, blindly poking port 0x510 > on x86 for now, hence my interest in having it listed in ACPI). > > Now, if we did expose fw_cfg in ACPI on *both* ARM and x86, I wonder > I could get away with an ACPI-only detection scheme across both > architectures... Nope, because there's no requirement for ACPI on ARM -- you could be booting the kernel via device tree. thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-01 20:10 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 20:27 ` Gabriel L. Somlo @ 2015-09-02 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2015-09-02 9:21 ` Laszlo Ersek 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2015-09-02 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Maydell Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Gabriel L. Somlo, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Marc Marí, Laszlo On Di, 2015-09-01 at 21:10 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 September 2015 at 20:13, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: > > Also, since I'll be tinkering with fw_cfg again, and you mentioned > > using DT on arm and ACPI on x86 to auto-detect the presence (and location) > > of fw_cfg from the guest-side in a related thread: > > I meant DT or ACPI on ARM, actually. I don't know what the x86 > approach is for fw_cfg but I think it's just "known address". Yes, "known address". And given that the firmware actually loads the acpi tables via fw_cfg that is very unlikely to change. Adding it to the acpi tables might be useful nevertheless so the guest os knows the ioports are in use. I think on arm the acpi situation is the same, but I think firmware detecting the location via DT should work without chicken&egg problems. cheers, Gerd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions 2015-09-02 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann @ 2015-09-02 9:21 ` Laszlo Ersek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2015-09-02 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gerd Hoffmann, Peter Maydell Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Gabriel L. Somlo, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Marc Marí On 09/02/15 10:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Di, 2015-09-01 at 21:10 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 1 September 2015 at 20:13, Gabriel L. Somlo <somlo@cmu.edu> wrote: >>> Also, since I'll be tinkering with fw_cfg again, and you mentioned >>> using DT on arm and ACPI on x86 to auto-detect the presence (and location) >>> of fw_cfg from the guest-side in a related thread: >> >> I meant DT or ACPI on ARM, actually. I don't know what the x86 >> approach is for fw_cfg but I think it's just "known address". > > Yes, "known address". And given that the firmware actually loads the > acpi tables via fw_cfg that is very unlikely to change. Adding it to > the acpi tables might be useful nevertheless so the guest os knows the > ioports are in use. > > I think on arm the acpi situation is the same, but I think firmware > detecting the location via DT should work without chicken&egg problems. First of all I apologize for lagging severely behind this thread; in practice I can't read emails longer than 20 lines or so. This one qualifies, so I'll respond: Yes, on qemu-system-(arm|aarch64) -M virt, detecting the fw_cfg registers via DT should continue to work without any dependencies. Thanks Laszlo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 ` Marc Marí 2015-08-31 15:36 ` Kevin O'Connor 2015-09-01 17:47 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo Add fw_cfg DMA interface specification in the documentation. Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> --- docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt index 5bc7b96..06302f6 100644 --- a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt +++ b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ increasing address order, similar to memcpy(). Selector Register IOport: 0x510 Data Register IOport: 0x511 +DMA Address IOport: 0x514 + +=== ARM Register Locations === + +Selector Register address: 0x09020000 +Data Register address: 0x09020008 +DMA Address address: 0x0902000c == Firmware Configuration Items == @@ -86,11 +93,12 @@ by selecting the "signature" item using key 0x0000 (FW_CFG_SIGNATURE), and reading four bytes from the data register. If the fw_cfg device is present, the four bytes read will contain the characters "QEMU". -=== Revision (Key 0x0001, FW_CFG_ID) === +=== Revision / feature bitmap (Key 0x0001, FW_CFG_ID) === -A 32-bit little-endian unsigned int, this item is used as an interface -revision number, and is currently set to 1 by QEMU when fw_cfg is -initialized. +A 32-bit little-endian unsigned int, this item is used to check for enabled +features. + - Bit 0: traditional interface. Always set. + - Bit 1: DMA interface. === File Directory (Key 0x0019, FW_CFG_FILE_DIR) === @@ -132,6 +140,58 @@ Selector Reg. Range Usage In practice, the number of allowed firmware configuration items is given by the value of FW_CFG_MAX_ENTRY (see fw_cfg.h). += Guest-side DMA Interface = + +If bit 1 of the feature bitmap is set, the DMA interface is present. This does +not replace the existing fw_cfg interface, it is an add-on. This interface +can be used through the 64-bit wide address register. + +The address register, as the selector register, is in little-endian format +when using IOports, and in big-endian format when using MMIO. The value for +the register is 0 at startup and after an operation. A write to the lower +half triggers an operation. This means, that operations with 32-bit addresses +can be triggered with just one write, whereas operations with 64-bit addresses +can be triggered with one 64-bit write or two 32-bit writes, starting with the +higher part. + +In this register, a physical RAM address to a FWCfgDmaAccess structure should +be written. This is the format of the FWCfgDmaAccess structure: + +typedef struct FWCfgDmaAccess { + uint32_t control; + uint32_t length; + uint64_t address; +} FWCfgDmaAccess; + +The fields of the structure are in big endian mode, and the field at the lowest +address is the "control" field. + +The "control" field has the following bits: + - Bit 0: Error + - Bit 1: Read + - Bit 2: Skip + +When an operation is triggered, if the "control" field has bit 1 set, a read +operation will be performed. "length" bytes for the current selector and +offset will be copied into the address specified by the "address" field. + +If the control field has only bit 2 set, a skip operation will be perfomed. +The offset for the current selector will be advanced "length" bytes. + +To check result, read the "control" field: + error bit set -> something went wrong. + all bits cleared -> transfer finished successfully. + otherwise -> transfer still in progress (doesn't happen + today due to implementation not being async, + but may in the future). + +Target address goes up and transfer length goes down as the transfer happens, +so after a successful transfer the length field is zero and the address field +points right after the memory block written. + +If a partial transfer happened before an error occured the address and +length registers indicate how much data has been transfered successfully. + = Host-side API = The following functions are available to the QEMU programmer for adding -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 15:36 ` Kevin O'Connor 2015-09-01 17:47 ` Peter Maydell 1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Kevin O'Connor @ 2015-08-31 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí; +Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Drew, Laszlo, qemu-devel, Gerd Hoffmann On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:10:14AM +0200, Marc Marí wrote: > Add fw_cfg DMA interface specification in the documentation. > > Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. Thanks for working on this. [...] > += Guest-side DMA Interface = > + > +If bit 1 of the feature bitmap is set, the DMA interface is present. This does > +not replace the existing fw_cfg interface, it is an add-on. This interface > +can be used through the 64-bit wide address register. > + > +The address register, as the selector register, is in little-endian format > +when using IOports, and in big-endian format when using MMIO. The value for > +the register is 0 at startup and after an operation. A write to the lower > +half triggers an operation. This means, that operations with 32-bit addresses > +can be triggered with just one write, whereas operations with 64-bit addresses > +can be triggered with one 64-bit write or two 32-bit writes, starting with the > +higher part. > + > +In this register, a physical RAM address to a FWCfgDmaAccess structure should > +be written. This is the format of the FWCfgDmaAccess structure: > + > +typedef struct FWCfgDmaAccess { > + uint32_t control; > + uint32_t length; > + uint64_t address; > +} FWCfgDmaAccess; > + > +The fields of the structure are in big endian mode, and the field at the lowest > +address is the "control" field. > + > +The "control" field has the following bits: > + - Bit 0: Error > + - Bit 1: Read > + - Bit 2: Skip > + > +When an operation is triggered, if the "control" field has bit 1 set, a read > +operation will be performed. "length" bytes for the current selector and > +offset will be copied into the address specified by the "address" field. > + > +If the control field has only bit 2 set, a skip operation will be perfomed. > +The offset for the current selector will be advanced "length" bytes. > + > +To check result, read the "control" field: > + error bit set -> something went wrong. > + all bits cleared -> transfer finished successfully. > + otherwise -> transfer still in progress (doesn't happen > + today due to implementation not being async, > + but may in the future). > + > +Target address goes up and transfer length goes down as the transfer happens, > +so after a successful transfer the length field is zero and the address field > +points right after the memory block written. > + > +If a partial transfer happened before an error occured the address and > +length registers indicate how much data has been transfered successfully. If the interface will support asynchronous transfers, then it is necessary to document which field QEMU will update last. That way, the guest will know which particular field to wait on. It should probably also be documented that that particular field must have native alignment (eg, alignment of 4 for a 32bit field). The reason this is important, is because of a subtle race condition. For example, if QEMU updates "length" and then "control", but the guest spins on "length" then it is possible for the guest to exit its spin loop and use the memory containing "control" for something else before QEMU finishes updating "control". This would result in corruption of that memory when QEMU later overwrites it. My suggestion would be for QEMU to only ever update "control" and not modify any other parts of the FWCfgDmaAccess struct. This makes the interface and documentation simpler and it sidesteps this issue. -Kevin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Marc Marí 2015-08-31 15:36 ` Kevin O'Connor @ 2015-09-01 17:47 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 17:56 ` Peter Maydell 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Laszlo On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> wrote: > Add fw_cfg DMA interface specification in the documentation. > > Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> > --- > docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > index 5bc7b96..06302f6 100644 > --- a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > +++ b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ increasing address order, similar to memcpy(). > > Selector Register IOport: 0x510 > Data Register IOport: 0x511 > +DMA Address IOport: 0x514 > + > +=== ARM Register Locations === > + > +Selector Register address: 0x09020000 > +Data Register address: 0x09020008 > +DMA Address address: 0x0902000c These addresses shouldn't be documented -- the correct API is that the guest needs to find the base address of the fw_cfg device via device tree or ACPI table. You can document the layout of the registers within the device, obviously (ie +0, +4, +8). > == Firmware Configuration Items == > > @@ -86,11 +93,12 @@ by selecting the "signature" item using key 0x0000 (FW_CFG_SIGNATURE), > and reading four bytes from the data register. If the fw_cfg device is > present, the four bytes read will contain the characters "QEMU". > > -=== Revision (Key 0x0001, FW_CFG_ID) === > +=== Revision / feature bitmap (Key 0x0001, FW_CFG_ID) === > > -A 32-bit little-endian unsigned int, this item is used as an interface > -revision number, and is currently set to 1 by QEMU when fw_cfg is > -initialized. > +A 32-bit little-endian unsigned int, this item is used to check for enabled > +features. > + - Bit 0: traditional interface. Always set. > + - Bit 1: DMA interface. > > === File Directory (Key 0x0019, FW_CFG_FILE_DIR) === > > @@ -132,6 +140,58 @@ Selector Reg. Range Usage > In practice, the number of allowed firmware configuration items is given > by the value of FW_CFG_MAX_ENTRY (see fw_cfg.h). > > += Guest-side DMA Interface = > + > +If bit 1 of the feature bitmap is set, the DMA interface is present. This does > +not replace the existing fw_cfg interface, it is an add-on. This interface > +can be used through the 64-bit wide address register. > + > +The address register, as the selector register, is in little-endian format > +when using IOports, and in big-endian format when using MMIO. The value for > +the register is 0 at startup and after an operation. A write to the lower > +half triggers an operation. This means, that operations with 32-bit addresses Delete this comma. > +can be triggered with just one write, whereas operations with 64-bit addresses > +can be triggered with one 64-bit write or two 32-bit writes, starting with the > +higher part. > + > +In this register, a physical RAM address to a FWCfgDmaAccess structure should "the physical address of a FWCfgDmaAccess structure in RAM" > +be written. This is the format of the FWCfgDmaAccess structure: > + > +typedef struct FWCfgDmaAccess { > + uint32_t control; > + uint32_t length; > + uint64_t address; > +} FWCfgDmaAccess; > + > +The fields of the structure are in big endian mode, and the field at the lowest > +address is the "control" field. > + > +The "control" field has the following bits: > + - Bit 0: Error > + - Bit 1: Read > + - Bit 2: Skip > + > +When an operation is triggered, if the "control" field has bit 1 set, a read > +operation will be performed. "length" bytes for the current selector and > +offset will be copied into the address specified by the "address" field. > + > +If the control field has only bit 2 set, a skip operation will be perfomed. > +The offset for the current selector will be advanced "length" bytes. The implication here is that the operation completes before the guest write to the address register returns, > +To check result, read the "control" field: > + error bit set -> something went wrong. > + all bits cleared -> transfer finished successfully. > + otherwise -> transfer still in progress (doesn't happen > + today due to implementation not being async, > + but may in the future). Is there much point in having an async transfer interface which requires the guest to busy-wait polling the control field? > + > +Target address goes up and transfer length goes down as the transfer happens, > +so after a successful transfer the length field is zero and the address field > +points right after the memory block written. > + > +If a partial transfer happened before an error occured the address and "occurred". > +length registers indicate how much data has been transfered successfully. "transferred". > + > = Host-side API = > > The following functions are available to the QEMU programmer for adding thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation 2015-09-01 17:47 ` Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 17:56 ` Peter Maydell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Laszlo On 1 September 2015 at 18:47, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> wrote: >> +=== ARM Register Locations === >> + >> +Selector Register address: 0x09020000 >> +Data Register address: 0x09020008 >> +DMA Address address: 0x0902000c > > These addresses shouldn't be documented -- the correct API is that the guest > needs to find the base address of the fw_cfg device via device tree > or ACPI table. You can document the layout of the registers within the > device, obviously (ie +0, +4, +8). ...and this is not what your patchset implements anyway. This should be: offset 0: data register (8 bytes wide) offset 8: selector register (4 bytes wide) offset 12: reserved offset 16: DMA address register (8 bytes wide) thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 ` Marc Marí 2015-08-31 15:58 ` Kevin O'Connor 2015-09-01 18:35 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for x86 Marc Marí 4 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as usual. Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> --- hw/arm/virt.c | 2 +- hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h | 15 ++- 3 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index d5a8417..b88c104 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static void create_fw_cfg(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) hwaddr size = vbi->memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG].size; char *nodename; - fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8); + fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, 0, NULL); nodename = g_strdup_printf("/fw-cfg@%" PRIx64, base); qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vbi->fdt, nodename); diff --git a/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c b/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c index 88481b7..7e5ba96 100644 --- a/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c +++ b/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ */ #include "hw/hw.h" #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" +#include "sysemu/dma.h" #include "hw/isa/isa.h" #include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h" #include "hw/sysbus.h" @@ -30,7 +31,8 @@ #include "qemu/error-report.h" #include "qemu/config-file.h" -#define FW_CFG_SIZE 2 +#define FW_CFG_IO_SIZE 12 /* Address aligned to 4 bytes */ +#define FW_CFG_CTL_SIZE 2 #define FW_CFG_NAME "fw_cfg" #define FW_CFG_PATH "/machine/" FW_CFG_NAME @@ -42,6 +44,15 @@ #define FW_CFG_IO(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(FWCfgIoState, (obj), TYPE_FW_CFG_IO) #define FW_CFG_MEM(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(FWCfgMemState, (obj), TYPE_FW_CFG_MEM) +/* FW_CFG_VERSION bits */ +#define FW_CFG_VERSION 0x01 +#define FW_CFG_VERSION_DMA 0x02 + +/* FW_CFG_DMA_CONTROL bits */ +#define FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR 0x01 +#define FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ 0x02 +#define FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP 0x04 + typedef struct FWCfgEntry { uint32_t len; uint8_t *data; @@ -59,6 +70,10 @@ struct FWCfgState { uint16_t cur_entry; uint32_t cur_offset; Notifier machine_ready; + + bool dma_enabled; + AddressSpace *dma_as; + dma_addr_t dma_addr; }; struct FWCfgIoState { @@ -75,7 +90,7 @@ struct FWCfgMemState { FWCfgState parent_obj; /*< public >*/ - MemoryRegion ctl_iomem, data_iomem; + MemoryRegion ctl_iomem, data_iomem, dma_iomem; uint32_t data_width; MemoryRegionOps wide_data_ops; }; @@ -294,6 +309,142 @@ static void fw_cfg_data_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, } while (i); } +static void fw_cfg_dma_transfer(FWCfgState *s) +{ + dma_addr_t len; + uint8_t *ptr; + void *addr; + FWCfgDmaAccess dma; + int arch = !!(s->cur_entry & FW_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL); + FWCfgEntry *e = &s->entries[arch][s->cur_entry & FW_CFG_ENTRY_MASK]; + + len = sizeof(dma); + addr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr, &len, + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); + + s->dma_addr = 0; + + if (!addr || !len) { + return; + } + + dma.address = be64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)(addr + + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, address))); + dma.length = be32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(addr + + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, length))); + dma.control = be32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(addr + + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, control))); + + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR) { + goto out; + } + + if (!(dma.control & (FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ | FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP))) { + goto out; + } + + while (dma.length > 0) { + if (s->cur_entry == FW_CFG_INVALID || !e->data || + s->cur_offset >= e->len) { + len = dma.length; + + /* If the access is not a read access, it will be a skip access, + * tested before. + */ + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) { + ptr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, dma.address, &len, + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); + if (!ptr || !len) { + dma.control |= FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR; + goto out; + } + + memset(ptr, 0, len); + + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, ptr, len, + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, len); + } + + } else { + if (dma.length <= e->len) { + len = dma.length; + } else { + len = e->len; + } + + if (e->read_callback) { + e->read_callback(e->callback_opaque, s->cur_offset); + } + + /* If the access is not a read access, it will be a skip access, + * tested before. + */ + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) { + ptr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, dma.address, &len, + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); + if (!ptr || !len) { + dma.control |= FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR; + goto out; + } + + memcpy(ptr, &e->data[s->cur_offset], len); + + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, ptr, len, + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, len); + } + + s->cur_offset += len; + + } + + dma.address += len; + dma.length -= len; + dma.control = 0; + + *(uint64_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, address)) = + cpu_to_be64(dma.address); + *(uint32_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, length)) = + cpu_to_be32(dma.length); + *(uint32_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, control)) = + cpu_to_be32(dma.control); + } + + trace_fw_cfg_read(s, 0); + +out: + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, addr, sizeof(dma), + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, sizeof(dma)); + return; + +} + +static void fw_cfg_dma_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, + uint64_t value, unsigned size) +{ + FWCfgState *s = opaque; + + if (size == 4) { + if (addr == 0) { + /* FWCfgDmaAccess high address */ + s->dma_addr = (0xFFFFFFFF & value) << 32; + } else if (addr == 4) { + /* FWCfgDmaAccess low address */ + s->dma_addr |= value; + fw_cfg_dma_transfer(s); + } + } else if (size == 8 && addr == 0) { + s->dma_addr = value; + fw_cfg_dma_transfer(s); + } +} + +static bool fw_cfg_dma_mem_valid(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, + unsigned size, bool is_write) +{ + return is_write && ((size == 4 && (addr == 0 || addr == 4)) || + (size == 8 && addr == 0)); +} + static bool fw_cfg_data_mem_valid(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size, bool is_write) { @@ -321,20 +472,35 @@ static uint64_t fw_cfg_comb_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, static void fw_cfg_comb_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t value, unsigned size) { - switch (size) { + FWCfgState *s; + + switch (addr) { + case 0: + fw_cfg_select(opaque, (uint16_t)value); + break; case 1: fw_cfg_write(opaque, (uint8_t)value); break; - case 2: - fw_cfg_select(opaque, (uint16_t)value); + case 4: + /* FWCfgDmaAccess low address */ + s = opaque; + s->dma_addr |= value; + fw_cfg_dma_transfer(s); break; + case 8: + /* FWCfgDmaAccess high address */ + s = opaque; + s->dma_addr = (0xFFFFFFFF & value) << 32; } } static bool fw_cfg_comb_valid(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size, bool is_write) { - return (size == 1) || (is_write && size == 2); + FWCfgState *s = opaque; + + return (size == 1) || (is_write && size == 2) || + (s->dma_enabled && is_write && addr >= 4); } static const MemoryRegionOps fw_cfg_ctl_mem_ops = { @@ -361,6 +527,12 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps fw_cfg_comb_mem_ops = { .valid.accepts = fw_cfg_comb_valid, }; +static const MemoryRegionOps fw_cfg_dma_mem_ops = { + .write = fw_cfg_dma_mem_write, + .endianness = DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN, + .valid.accepts = fw_cfg_dma_mem_valid, +}; + static void fw_cfg_reset(DeviceState *d) { FWCfgState *s = FW_CFG(d); @@ -401,6 +573,22 @@ static bool is_version_1(void *opaque, int version_id) return version_id == 1; } +static bool fw_cfg_dma_enabled(void *opaque) +{ + FWCfgState *s = opaque; + + return s->dma_enabled; +} + +static VMStateDescription vmstate_fw_cfg_dma = { + .name = "fw_cfg/dma", + .needed = fw_cfg_dma_enabled, + .fields = (VMStateField[]) { + VMSTATE_UINT64(dma_addr, FWCfgState), + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST() + }, +}; + static const VMStateDescription vmstate_fw_cfg = { .name = "fw_cfg", .version_id = 2, @@ -410,6 +598,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_fw_cfg = { VMSTATE_UINT16_HACK(cur_offset, FWCfgState, is_version_1), VMSTATE_UINT32_V(cur_offset, FWCfgState, 2), VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST() + }, + .subsections = (const VMStateDescription*[]) { + &vmstate_fw_cfg_dma, + NULL, } }; @@ -595,7 +787,6 @@ static void fw_cfg_init1(DeviceState *dev) qdev_init_nofail(dev); fw_cfg_add_bytes(s, FW_CFG_SIGNATURE, (char *)"QEMU", 4); - fw_cfg_add_i32(s, FW_CFG_ID, 1); fw_cfg_add_bytes(s, FW_CFG_UUID, qemu_uuid, 16); fw_cfg_add_i16(s, FW_CFG_NOGRAPHIC, (uint16_t)(display_type == DT_NOGRAPHIC)); fw_cfg_add_i16(s, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, (uint16_t)smp_cpus); @@ -607,22 +798,45 @@ static void fw_cfg_init1(DeviceState *dev) qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&s->machine_ready); } -FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_io(uint32_t iobase) +FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_io_dma(uint32_t iobase, AddressSpace *dma_as) { DeviceState *dev; + FWCfgState *s; + uint32_t version = FW_CFG_VERSION; dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_FW_CFG_IO); qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "iobase", iobase); + fw_cfg_init1(dev); + s = FW_CFG(dev); + + if (dma_as) { + /* 64 bits for the address field */ + s->dma_as = dma_as; + s->dma_enabled = true; + s->dma_addr = 0; + + version |= FW_CFG_VERSION_DMA; + } + + fw_cfg_add_i32(s, FW_CFG_ID, version); - return FW_CFG(dev); + return s; } -FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(hwaddr ctl_addr, hwaddr data_addr, - uint32_t data_width) +FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_io(uint32_t iobase) +{ + return fw_cfg_init_io_dma(iobase, NULL); +} + +FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(hwaddr ctl_addr, + hwaddr data_addr, uint32_t data_width, + hwaddr dma_addr, AddressSpace *dma_as) { DeviceState *dev; SysBusDevice *sbd; + FWCfgState *s; + uint32_t version = FW_CFG_VERSION; dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_FW_CFG_MEM); qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "data_width", data_width); @@ -633,13 +847,26 @@ FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(hwaddr ctl_addr, hwaddr data_addr, sysbus_mmio_map(sbd, 0, ctl_addr); sysbus_mmio_map(sbd, 1, data_addr); - return FW_CFG(dev); + s = FW_CFG(dev); + + if (dma_addr && dma_as) { + s->dma_as = dma_as; + s->dma_enabled = true; + s->dma_addr = 0; + sysbus_mmio_map(sbd, 2, dma_addr); + version |= FW_CFG_VERSION_DMA; + } + + fw_cfg_add_i32(s, FW_CFG_ID, version); + + return s; } FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem(hwaddr ctl_addr, hwaddr data_addr) { return fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(ctl_addr, data_addr, - fw_cfg_data_mem_ops.valid.max_access_size); + fw_cfg_data_mem_ops.valid.max_access_size, + 0, NULL); } @@ -675,7 +902,7 @@ static void fw_cfg_io_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev); memory_region_init_io(&s->comb_iomem, OBJECT(s), &fw_cfg_comb_mem_ops, - FW_CFG(s), "fwcfg", FW_CFG_SIZE); + FW_CFG(s), "fwcfg", FW_CFG_IO_SIZE); sysbus_add_io(sbd, s->iobase, &s->comb_iomem); } @@ -707,7 +934,7 @@ static void fw_cfg_mem_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) const MemoryRegionOps *data_ops = &fw_cfg_data_mem_ops; memory_region_init_io(&s->ctl_iomem, OBJECT(s), &fw_cfg_ctl_mem_ops, - FW_CFG(s), "fwcfg.ctl", FW_CFG_SIZE); + FW_CFG(s), "fwcfg.ctl", FW_CFG_CTL_SIZE); sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->ctl_iomem); if (s->data_width > data_ops->valid.max_access_size) { @@ -725,6 +952,10 @@ static void fw_cfg_mem_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) memory_region_init_io(&s->data_iomem, OBJECT(s), data_ops, FW_CFG(s), "fwcfg.data", data_ops->valid.max_access_size); sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->data_iomem); + + memory_region_init_io(&s->dma_iomem, OBJECT(s), &fw_cfg_dma_mem_ops, + FW_CFG(s), "fwcfg.dma", sizeof(dma_addr_t)); + sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->dma_iomem); } static void fw_cfg_mem_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) diff --git a/include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h b/include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h index e60d3ca..d0cbc88 100644 --- a/include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h +++ b/include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h @@ -61,6 +61,15 @@ typedef struct FWCfgFiles { FWCfgFile f[]; } FWCfgFiles; +/* Control as first field allows for different structures selected by this + * field, which might be useful in the future + */ +typedef struct FWCfgDmaAccess { + uint32_t control; + uint32_t length; + uint64_t address; +} QEMU_PACKED FWCfgDmaAccess; + typedef void (*FWCfgCallback)(void *opaque, uint8_t *data); typedef void (*FWCfgReadCallback)(void *opaque, uint32_t offset); @@ -77,10 +86,12 @@ void fw_cfg_add_file_callback(FWCfgState *s, const char *filename, void *data, size_t len); void *fw_cfg_modify_file(FWCfgState *s, const char *filename, void *data, size_t len); +FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_io_dma(uint32_t iobase, AddressSpace *dma_as); FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_io(uint32_t iobase); FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem(hwaddr ctl_addr, hwaddr data_addr); -FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(hwaddr ctl_addr, hwaddr data_addr, - uint32_t data_width); +FWCfgState *fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(hwaddr ctl_addr, + hwaddr data_addr, uint32_t data_width, + hwaddr dma_addr, AddressSpace *dma_as); FWCfgState *fw_cfg_find(void); -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 15:58 ` Kevin O'Connor 2015-09-01 18:35 ` Peter Maydell 1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Kevin O'Connor @ 2015-08-31 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí; +Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi, Drew, Laszlo, qemu-devel, Gerd Hoffmann On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:10:15AM +0200, Marc Marí wrote: > Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > > This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as usual. > > Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> > --- > hw/arm/virt.c | 2 +- > hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h | 15 ++- > 3 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > index d5a8417..b88c104 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static void create_fw_cfg(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) > hwaddr size = vbi->memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG].size; > char *nodename; > > - fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8); > + fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, 0, NULL); > > nodename = g_strdup_printf("/fw-cfg@%" PRIx64, base); > qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vbi->fdt, nodename); > diff --git a/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c b/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c > index 88481b7..7e5ba96 100644 > --- a/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c > +++ b/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > */ > #include "hw/hw.h" > #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" > +#include "sysemu/dma.h" > #include "hw/isa/isa.h" > #include "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h" > #include "hw/sysbus.h" > @@ -30,7 +31,8 @@ > #include "qemu/error-report.h" > #include "qemu/config-file.h" > > -#define FW_CFG_SIZE 2 > +#define FW_CFG_IO_SIZE 12 /* Address aligned to 4 bytes */ > +#define FW_CFG_CTL_SIZE 2 > #define FW_CFG_NAME "fw_cfg" > #define FW_CFG_PATH "/machine/" FW_CFG_NAME > > @@ -42,6 +44,15 @@ > #define FW_CFG_IO(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(FWCfgIoState, (obj), TYPE_FW_CFG_IO) > #define FW_CFG_MEM(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(FWCfgMemState, (obj), TYPE_FW_CFG_MEM) > > +/* FW_CFG_VERSION bits */ > +#define FW_CFG_VERSION 0x01 > +#define FW_CFG_VERSION_DMA 0x02 > + > +/* FW_CFG_DMA_CONTROL bits */ > +#define FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR 0x01 > +#define FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ 0x02 > +#define FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP 0x04 > + > typedef struct FWCfgEntry { > uint32_t len; > uint8_t *data; > @@ -59,6 +70,10 @@ struct FWCfgState { > uint16_t cur_entry; > uint32_t cur_offset; > Notifier machine_ready; > + > + bool dma_enabled; > + AddressSpace *dma_as; > + dma_addr_t dma_addr; > }; > > struct FWCfgIoState { > @@ -75,7 +90,7 @@ struct FWCfgMemState { > FWCfgState parent_obj; > /*< public >*/ > > - MemoryRegion ctl_iomem, data_iomem; > + MemoryRegion ctl_iomem, data_iomem, dma_iomem; > uint32_t data_width; > MemoryRegionOps wide_data_ops; > }; > @@ -294,6 +309,142 @@ static void fw_cfg_data_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > } while (i); > } > > +static void fw_cfg_dma_transfer(FWCfgState *s) > +{ > + dma_addr_t len; > + uint8_t *ptr; > + void *addr; > + FWCfgDmaAccess dma; > + int arch = !!(s->cur_entry & FW_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL); > + FWCfgEntry *e = &s->entries[arch][s->cur_entry & FW_CFG_ENTRY_MASK]; > + > + len = sizeof(dma); > + addr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr, &len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); > + > + s->dma_addr = 0; > + > + if (!addr || !len) { > + return; > + } > + > + dma.address = be64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)(addr + > + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, address))); > + dma.length = be32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(addr + > + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, length))); > + dma.control = be32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(addr + > + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, control))); I am not that familiar with QEMU, but shouldn't that be DMA_DIRECTION_TO_DEVICE? It looks like other drivers use dma_memory_read() which would simplify this code: dma_memory_read(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr, &dma, sizeof(dma)); dma.address = be64_to_cpu(dma.address); dma.length = be32_to_cpu(dma.length); dma.control = be32_to_cpu(dma.control); > + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR) { > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (!(dma.control & (FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ | FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP))) { > + goto out; > + } > + > + while (dma.length > 0) { > + if (s->cur_entry == FW_CFG_INVALID || !e->data || > + s->cur_offset >= e->len) { > + len = dma.length; > + > + /* If the access is not a read access, it will be a skip access, > + * tested before. > + */ > + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) { > + ptr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, dma.address, &len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); > + if (!ptr || !len) { > + dma.control |= FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR; > + goto out; > + } > + > + memset(ptr, 0, len); > + > + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, ptr, len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, len); > + } > + > + } else { > + if (dma.length <= e->len) { > + len = dma.length; > + } else { > + len = e->len; > + } > + > + if (e->read_callback) { > + e->read_callback(e->callback_opaque, s->cur_offset); > + } > + > + /* If the access is not a read access, it will be a skip access, > + * tested before. > + */ > + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) { > + ptr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, dma.address, &len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); > + if (!ptr || !len) { > + dma.control |= FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR; > + goto out; > + } > + > + memcpy(ptr, &e->data[s->cur_offset], len); > + > + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, ptr, len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, len); > + } > + > + s->cur_offset += len; > + > + } > + > + dma.address += len; > + dma.length -= len; > + dma.control = 0; > + > + *(uint64_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, address)) = > + cpu_to_be64(dma.address); > + *(uint32_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, length)) = > + cpu_to_be32(dma.length); > + *(uint32_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, control)) = > + cpu_to_be32(dma.control); > + } I don't think it makes sense for this update to be performed within the loop. As I mentioned in another email, I think just updating control would be sufficient. Looks like include/sysemu/dma.h defines a stl_be_dma() macro for performing a single 32bit dma write. Thanks, -Kevin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí 2015-08-31 15:58 ` Kevin O'Connor @ 2015-09-01 18:35 ` Peter Maydell 1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Laszlo On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> wrote: > Based on the specifications on docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt > > This interface is an addon. The old interface can still be used as usual. > > Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> > @@ -294,6 +309,142 @@ static void fw_cfg_data_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > } while (i); > } > > +static void fw_cfg_dma_transfer(FWCfgState *s) > +{ > + dma_addr_t len; > + uint8_t *ptr; > + void *addr; > + FWCfgDmaAccess dma; > + int arch = !!(s->cur_entry & FW_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL); > + FWCfgEntry *e = &s->entries[arch][s->cur_entry & FW_CFG_ENTRY_MASK]; > + > + len = sizeof(dma); > + addr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr, &len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); > + > + s->dma_addr = 0; > + > + if (!addr || !len) { > + return; > + } > + > + dma.address = be64_to_cpu(*(uint64_t *)(addr + > + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, address))); > + dma.length = be32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(addr + > + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, length))); > + dma.control = be32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)(addr + > + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, control))); There are only three fields in this struct, so rather than using dma_memory_map/unmap and manual byteswapping, how about: dma.control = ldl_be_dma(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr); dma.length = ldl_be_dma(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr + 4); dma.address = ldq_be_dma(s->dma_as, s->dma_addr + 8); Kevin's suggestion to use dma_memory_read() would be OK as well, if you really want to check for the return value from the memory transaction. But you probably don't care because if the guest has pointed the dma address register into nowhere then it deserves whatever it gets as long as we don't fall over; and we need to not fall over whatever the values of control/length/address are. In any case, please don't use dma_memory_map/unmap. There are st*_ versions for writing back updated values. > + > + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR) { > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (!(dma.control & (FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ | FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_SKIP))) { > + goto out; > + } > + > + while (dma.length > 0) { > + if (s->cur_entry == FW_CFG_INVALID || !e->data || > + s->cur_offset >= e->len) { > + len = dma.length; > + > + /* If the access is not a read access, it will be a skip access, > + * tested before. > + */ > + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) { > + ptr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, dma.address, &len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); > + if (!ptr || !len) { > + dma.control |= FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR; > + goto out; > + } > + > + memset(ptr, 0, len); > + > + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, ptr, len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, len); dma_memory_write() would be better than map-zero-unmap I think, though you would need to have a handy buffer of zeroes to pass to that function, so maybe not. > + } > + > + } else { > + if (dma.length <= e->len) { > + len = dma.length; > + } else { > + len = e->len; > + } > + > + if (e->read_callback) { > + e->read_callback(e->callback_opaque, s->cur_offset); > + } > + > + /* If the access is not a read access, it will be a skip access, > + * tested before. > + */ > + if (dma.control & FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_READ) { > + ptr = dma_memory_map(s->dma_as, dma.address, &len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE); > + if (!ptr || !len) { > + dma.control |= FW_CFG_DMA_CTL_ERROR; > + goto out; > + } > + > + memcpy(ptr, &e->data[s->cur_offset], len); > + > + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, ptr, len, > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, len); ...and dma_memory_write() is definitely better than map-memcpy-unmap. > + } > + > + s->cur_offset += len; > + > + } > + > + dma.address += len; > + dma.length -= len; > + dma.control = 0; > + > + *(uint64_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, address)) = > + cpu_to_be64(dma.address); > + *(uint32_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, length)) = > + cpu_to_be32(dma.length); > + *(uint32_t *)(addr + offsetof(FWCfgDmaAccess, control)) = > + cpu_to_be32(dma.control); > + } > + > + trace_fw_cfg_read(s, 0); > + > +out: > + dma_memory_unmap(s->dma_as, addr, sizeof(dma), > + DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE, sizeof(dma)); > + return; > + > +} > + > +static void fw_cfg_dma_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > + uint64_t value, unsigned size) > +{ > + FWCfgState *s = opaque; > + > + if (size == 4) { > + if (addr == 0) { > + /* FWCfgDmaAccess high address */ > + s->dma_addr = (0xFFFFFFFF & value) << 32; The mask here is unnecessary, since you're shifting by 32 bits. > + } else if (addr == 4) { > + /* FWCfgDmaAccess low address */ > + s->dma_addr |= value; > + fw_cfg_dma_transfer(s); > + } > + } else if (size == 8 && addr == 0) { > + s->dma_addr = value; > + fw_cfg_dma_transfer(s); > + } > +} > + > +static bool fw_cfg_dma_mem_valid(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > + unsigned size, bool is_write) > +{ > + return is_write && ((size == 4 && (addr == 0 || addr == 4)) || > + (size == 8 && addr == 0)); > +} > + > static bool fw_cfg_data_mem_valid(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > unsigned size, bool is_write) > { > @@ -321,20 +472,35 @@ static uint64_t fw_cfg_comb_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > static void fw_cfg_comb_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > uint64_t value, unsigned size) > { > - switch (size) { > + FWCfgState *s; > + > + switch (addr) { > + case 0: > + fw_cfg_select(opaque, (uint16_t)value); > + break; > case 1: > fw_cfg_write(opaque, (uint8_t)value); > break; > - case 2: > - fw_cfg_select(opaque, (uint16_t)value); > + case 4: > + /* FWCfgDmaAccess low address */ > + s = opaque; > + s->dma_addr |= value; > + fw_cfg_dma_transfer(s); > break; > + case 8: > + /* FWCfgDmaAccess high address */ > + s = opaque; > + s->dma_addr = (0xFFFFFFFF & value) << 32; > } > } > > static bool fw_cfg_comb_valid(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > unsigned size, bool is_write) > { > - return (size == 1) || (is_write && size == 2); > + FWCfgState *s = opaque; > + > + return (size == 1) || (is_write && size == 2) || > + (s->dma_enabled && is_write && addr >= 4); This doesn't look right, since it will allow 1 and 2 byte writes to the dma_address port, which doesn't seem like a great idea. Maybe it would be easier to make the dma port its own memory region (and then init and sysbus_add_io() it in fw_cfg_io_realize()) ? Then you wouldn't need to mess with the already confusing logic for handling combined config/data ports (which have to be handled together because of the weird "1 byte accesses are data and 2 byte accesses are config" semantics). thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 ` Marc Marí 2015-09-01 18:02 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for x86 Marc Marí 4 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo Enable the fw_cfg DMA interface for the ARM virt machine. Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> --- hw/arm/virt.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index b88c104..54d5f54 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static const MemMapEntry a15memmap[] = { [VIRT_GIC_V2M] = { 0x08020000, 0x00001000 }, [VIRT_UART] = { 0x09000000, 0x00001000 }, [VIRT_RTC] = { 0x09010000, 0x00001000 }, - [VIRT_FW_CFG] = { 0x09020000, 0x0000000a }, + [VIRT_FW_CFG] = { 0x09020000, 0x00000014 }, [VIRT_MMIO] = { 0x0a000000, 0x00000200 }, /* ...repeating for a total of NUM_VIRTIO_TRANSPORTS, each of that size */ [VIRT_PLATFORM_BUS] = { 0x0c000000, 0x02000000 }, @@ -614,13 +614,13 @@ static void create_flash(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) g_free(nodename); } -static void create_fw_cfg(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) +static void create_fw_cfg(AddressSpace *as, const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) { hwaddr base = vbi->memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG].base; hwaddr size = vbi->memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG].size; char *nodename; - fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, 0, NULL); + fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, base + 16, as); nodename = g_strdup_printf("/fw-cfg@%" PRIx64, base); qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vbi->fdt, nodename); @@ -808,6 +808,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) VirtGuestInfoState *guest_info_state = g_malloc0(sizeof *guest_info_state); VirtGuestInfo *guest_info = &guest_info_state->info; char **cpustr; + AddressSpace *as = NULL; if (!cpu_model) { cpu_model = "cortex-a15"; @@ -845,6 +846,10 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) } cpuobj = object_new(object_class_get_name(oc)); + if (!as) { + as = CPU(cpuobj)->as; + } + /* Handle any CPU options specified by the user */ cc->parse_features(CPU(cpuobj), cpuopts, &err); g_free(cpuopts); @@ -897,7 +902,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) */ create_virtio_devices(vbi, pic); - create_fw_cfg(vbi); + create_fw_cfg(as, vbi); rom_set_fw(fw_cfg_find()); guest_info->smp_cpus = smp_cpus; -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM Marc Marí @ 2015-09-01 18:02 ` Peter Maydell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Marí Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, QEMU Developers, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Laszlo On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> wrote: > Enable the fw_cfg DMA interface for the ARM virt machine. > > Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> > --- > hw/arm/virt.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c > index b88c104..54d5f54 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/virt.c > +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static const MemMapEntry a15memmap[] = { > [VIRT_GIC_V2M] = { 0x08020000, 0x00001000 }, > [VIRT_UART] = { 0x09000000, 0x00001000 }, > [VIRT_RTC] = { 0x09010000, 0x00001000 }, > - [VIRT_FW_CFG] = { 0x09020000, 0x0000000a }, > + [VIRT_FW_CFG] = { 0x09020000, 0x00000014 }, > [VIRT_MMIO] = { 0x0a000000, 0x00000200 }, > /* ...repeating for a total of NUM_VIRTIO_TRANSPORTS, each of that size */ > [VIRT_PLATFORM_BUS] = { 0x0c000000, 0x02000000 }, > @@ -614,13 +614,13 @@ static void create_flash(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) > g_free(nodename); > } > > -static void create_fw_cfg(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) > +static void create_fw_cfg(AddressSpace *as, const VirtBoardInfo *vbi) Please keep vbi as the first argument; this matches the other functions in this file. Calling the argument dma_as would probably be a little more informative. > { > hwaddr base = vbi->memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG].base; > hwaddr size = vbi->memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG].size; > char *nodename; > > - fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, 0, NULL); > + fw_cfg_init_mem_wide(base + 8, base, 8, base + 16, as); > > nodename = g_strdup_printf("/fw-cfg@%" PRIx64, base); > qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vbi->fdt, nodename); > @@ -808,6 +808,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > VirtGuestInfoState *guest_info_state = g_malloc0(sizeof *guest_info_state); > VirtGuestInfo *guest_info = &guest_info_state->info; > char **cpustr; > + AddressSpace *as = NULL; > > if (!cpu_model) { > cpu_model = "cortex-a15"; > @@ -845,6 +846,10 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > } > cpuobj = object_new(object_class_get_name(oc)); > > + if (!as) { > + as = CPU(cpuobj)->as; > + } This seems like a weird thing to set the fw_cfg DMA address space to. (Either the fw_cfg device shouldn't care which CPU it is being accessing by and shouldn't use any particular CPU's address space, or it needs to really care about the CPU that's doing any particular write to it and use that exact CPU's address space, selected at runtime. The former is the most likely and matches what actual DMA hardware devices will do.) Why not just use address_space_memory ? > + > /* Handle any CPU options specified by the user */ > cc->parse_features(CPU(cpuobj), cpuopts, &err); > g_free(cpuopts); > @@ -897,7 +902,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) > */ > create_virtio_devices(vbi, pic); > > - create_fw_cfg(vbi); > + create_fw_cfg(as, vbi); > rom_set_fw(fw_cfg_find()); > > guest_info->smp_cpus = smp_cpus; > -- > 2.4.3 thanks -- PMM ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for x86 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 ` Marc Marí 4 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Marc Marí @ 2015-08-31 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Drew, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin O'Connor, Gerd Hoffmann, Marc Marí, Laszlo Enable the fw_cfg DMA interface for all the x86 platforms. Based on Gerd Hoffman's initial implementation. Signed-off-by: Marc Marí <markmb@redhat.com> --- hw/i386/pc.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index 9f2924e..c6dc84f 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -753,14 +753,15 @@ static void pc_build_smbios(FWCfgState *fw_cfg) } } -static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(void) +static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(AddressSpace *as) { FWCfgState *fw_cfg; uint64_t *numa_fw_cfg; int i, j; unsigned int apic_id_limit = pc_apic_id_limit(max_cpus); - fw_cfg = fw_cfg_init_io(BIOS_CFG_IOPORT); + fw_cfg = fw_cfg_init_io_dma(BIOS_CFG_IOPORT, as); + /* FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS is a bit confusing/problematic on x86: * * SeaBIOS needs FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS for CPU hotplug, but the CPU hotplug @@ -1316,6 +1317,7 @@ FWCfgState *pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, MemoryRegion *ram_below_4g, *ram_above_4g; FWCfgState *fw_cfg; MachineState *machine = MACHINE(pcms); + AddressSpace *as; assert(machine->ram_size == pcms->below_4g_mem_size + pcms->above_4g_mem_size); @@ -1407,7 +1409,10 @@ FWCfgState *pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, option_rom_mr, 1); - fw_cfg = bochs_bios_init(); + as = g_malloc(sizeof(*as)); + address_space_init(as, ram_below_4g, "pc.as"); + fw_cfg = bochs_bios_init(as); + rom_set_fw(fw_cfg); if (guest_info->has_reserved_memory && pcms->hotplug_memory.base) { -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-02 9:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-08-31 9:08 [Qemu-devel] QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Marc Marí 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions Marc Marí 2015-09-01 17:33 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 17:45 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-01 18:45 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 19:13 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-01 20:10 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 20:27 ` Gabriel L. Somlo 2015-09-01 20:30 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-02 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2015-09-02 9:21 ` Laszlo Ersek 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] fw_cfg DMA interface documentation Marc Marí 2015-08-31 15:36 ` Kevin O'Connor 2015-09-01 17:47 ` Peter Maydell 2015-09-01 17:56 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] Implement fw_cfg DMA interface Marc Marí 2015-08-31 15:58 ` Kevin O'Connor 2015-09-01 18:35 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for ARM Marc Marí 2015-09-01 18:02 ` Peter Maydell 2015-08-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] Enable fw_cfg DMA interface for x86 Marc Marí
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).