From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 19/23] s390/sclp: ignore memory hotplug operations if it is disabled
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:13:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441019643-10677-20-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441019643-10677-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If no memory hotplug device was created, the sclp command facility is
not exposed (SCLP_FC_ASSIGN_ATTACH_READ_STOR). We therefore have no
memory hotplug and should correctly report SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND
if any such command is executed.
This gets rid of these ugly asserts that could have been triggered
for the s390-virtio machine.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
---
hw/s390x/sclp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index 3ad5d3a..b1a62c7 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -130,7 +130,10 @@ static void read_storage_element0_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
ReadStorageElementInfo *storage_info = (ReadStorageElementInfo *) sccb;
sclpMemoryHotplugDev *mhd = get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev();
- assert(mhd);
+ if (!mhd) {
+ sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ return;
+ }
if ((ram_size >> mhd->increment_size) >= 0x10000) {
sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
@@ -154,7 +157,10 @@ static void read_storage_element1_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
ReadStorageElementInfo *storage_info = (ReadStorageElementInfo *) sccb;
sclpMemoryHotplugDev *mhd = get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev();
- assert(mhd);
+ if (!mhd) {
+ sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ return;
+ }
if ((mhd->standby_mem_size >> mhd->increment_size) >= 0x10000) {
sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
@@ -177,7 +183,10 @@ static void attach_storage_element(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb,
AttachStorageElement *attach_info = (AttachStorageElement *) sccb;
sclpMemoryHotplugDev *mhd = get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev();
- assert(mhd);
+ if (!mhd) {
+ sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ return;
+ }
if (element != 1) {
sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
@@ -201,10 +210,15 @@ static void assign_storage(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
uint64_t this_subregion_size;
AssignStorage *assign_info = (AssignStorage *) sccb;
sclpMemoryHotplugDev *mhd = get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev();
- assert(mhd);
- ram_addr_t assign_addr = (assign_info->rn - 1) * mhd->rzm;
+ ram_addr_t assign_addr;
MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
+ if (!mhd) {
+ sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ return;
+ }
+ assign_addr = (assign_info->rn - 1) * mhd->rzm;
+
if ((assign_addr % MEM_SECTION_SIZE == 0) &&
(assign_addr >= mhd->padded_ram_size)) {
/* Re-use existing memory region if found */
@@ -255,10 +269,15 @@ static void unassign_storage(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
MemoryRegion *mr = NULL;
AssignStorage *assign_info = (AssignStorage *) sccb;
sclpMemoryHotplugDev *mhd = get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev();
- assert(mhd);
- ram_addr_t unassign_addr = (assign_info->rn - 1) * mhd->rzm;
+ ram_addr_t unassign_addr;
MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
+ if (!mhd) {
+ sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ return;
+ }
+ unassign_addr = (assign_info->rn - 1) * mhd->rzm;
+
/* if the addr is a multiple of 256 MB */
if ((unassign_addr % MEM_SECTION_SIZE == 0) &&
(unassign_addr >= mhd->padded_ram_size)) {
--
2.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 11:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/23] s390x: further patches Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/23] s390x/css: handle ccw-0 TIC correctly Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/23] s390x/css: ccw-0 enforces count > 0 Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/23] s390x/event-facility: fix receive mask check Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/23] s390x/css: start with cleared cstat/dstat Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/23] s390x/event-facility: fix location of receive mask Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/23] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Device detection in higher subchannel sets Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/23] pc-bios/s390-ccw: rebuild image Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/23] s390x/kvm: make setting of in-kernel irq routes more efficient Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/23] s390x/gdb: support reading/writing of control registers Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/23] sclp/s390: rework sclp cpu hotplug device notification Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/23] s390/sclp: rework sclp event facility initialization + device realization Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/23] s390/sclp: replace sclp event types with proper defines Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/23] s390/sclp: temporarily fix unassignment/reassignment of memory subregions Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/23] s390/sclp: introduce a root sclp device Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/23] s390/sclp: move sclp_execute related functions into the SCLP class Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 16/23] s390/sclp: move sclp_service_interrupt into the sclp device Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/23] s390: no need to manually parse for slots and maxmem Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/23] s390: disallow memory hotplug for the s390-virtio machine Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:13 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2015-08-31 11:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/23] s390: move memory calculation into the sclp device Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 21/23] s390: unify allocation of initial memory Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 22/23] s390/sclp: store the increment_size in the sclp device Cornelia Huck
2015-08-31 11:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/23] s390/sclp: simplify calculation of rnmax Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1441019643-10677-20-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).