From: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] rtl8139: Fix buffer overflow in standard mode
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:26:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441121206-6997-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> (raw)
When rtl8139 card is running in standard mode, it is very easy
to overlflow and the receive buffer and get into a siutation
where all packets are dropped. Simply reproduction case is
to ping the guest from the host with 6500 byte packets.
There are actually 2 problems here.
1) When the rtl8129 buffer is overflow, the card emulation
returns the size of the packet back to queue transmission.
This signals successful reception even though the packet
has been dropped. The proper solution is to return 0, so
that the packet is re-queued and will be resubmitted later.
2) The RxBuffAddr pointer used to track where packet is to be written
is aligned on a 4 byte boundary thus potentially adding some padding
between packets. This padding is ignored when checking for overflow
condition. It is possible to craft the packet such that we would
fail to detect an overflow and trigger buffer overwrite. Adding
padding to the overflow check resolves this issues.
V4: As Jason Wang correctly pointed out, the overflow check should
catch this. The reason it wasn't catching was that it was ignorring
the padding that may exist between each packet. Adding the padding
to the overflow check resolved the issue. This becomes a much
simpler fix.
V3: Fix the second patch to correctly track unread and available buffer
speace. Prior version used calculation for availble space to track
unread space which was wrong.
V2: instead of tracking buffer_full condition, changed the code, as
suggested by Stefan Hajnoczi, to track the number of unread bytes
instead. We initialize it to 0 at the start, adjust it on every
receive from the network and read from the guest and can set
the number of unread of bytes to full buffer size when the buffer
full.
Vladislav Yasevich (2):
rtl8139: Fix receive buffer overflow check
rtl8139: Do not consume the packet during overflow in standard mode.
hw/net/rtl8139.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
1.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 15:26 Vladislav Yasevich [this message]
2015-09-01 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] rtl8139: Fix receive buffer overflow check Vladislav Yasevich
2015-09-02 3:09 ` Jason Wang
2015-09-01 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/2] rtl8139: Do not consume the packet during overflow in standard mode Vladislav Yasevich
2015-09-02 3:09 ` Jason Wang
2015-09-02 12:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] rtl8139: Fix buffer " Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-09-02 12:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1441121206-6997-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).