From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaKP9-0001E8-2l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 05:13:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaKP5-0005Jg-T4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 05:13:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1441962833.29362.16.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:13:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55F2830C.1000308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <1436788726-20590-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <55F2830C.1000308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-vga: enable for i386 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fr, 2015-09-11 at 10:30 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 13.07.2015 14:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini > > Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann > > Gerd, -trivial received 3 patches like this enabling various virtio > bits for various architectures. I never got any reviewed-by or ACK > on these patches, so they're not applied still. Maybe you can add > some explanation as to why you think it's a good idea, or else it > doesn't seem like a trivial change? :) This one just syncs x86_64 and i386. Dunno about the other ones, have a pointer? cheers, Gerd