From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhdw8-0005U3-2l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:30:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhdw4-0007iG-1m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:30:16 -0400 From: Thomas Huth Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:30:07 +0200 Message-Id: <1443706207-29420-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: Add "slb-size" property to CPU device tree nodes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Gibson Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org According to a commit message in the Linux kernel (see here https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b60c31d85a2a for example), the name of the property that carries the information about the number of SLB entries should be called "slb-size", and not "ibm,slb-size". The Linux kernel can deal with both names, but to be on the safe side we should support the official name, too. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- hw/ppc/spapr.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c index a9b5f2a..ba6b273 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ static void spapr_populate_cpu_dt(CPUState *cs, void *fdt, int offset, _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "timebase-frequency", tbfreq))); _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "clock-frequency", cpufreq))); + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "slb-size", env->slb_nr))); _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "ibm,slb-size", env->slb_nr))); _FDT((fdt_setprop_string(fdt, offset, "status", "okay"))); _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "64-bit", NULL, 0))); -- 1.8.3.1