qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] events doubts
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 2015 22:00:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444161658-15038-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444161658-15038-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

It is not clear what separates REPLAY_ASYNC_EVENT_BH from other async
events.  It seems to be an ordering issue, but then why do input events
not have to be looked up in the queue?  It would be much simpler if they
are all handled the same way.
---
 replay/replay-events.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/replay/replay-events.c b/replay/replay-events.c
index 402f644..d6c61f6 100644
--- a/replay/replay-events.c
+++ b/replay/replay-events.c
@@ -203,13 +203,15 @@ static Event *replay_read_event(int checkpoint)
         return NULL;
     }
 
-    /* Events that has not to be in the queue */
+    /* Read event-specific data */
     switch (read_event_kind) {
     case REPLAY_ASYNC_EVENT_BH:
         if (read_id == -1) {
             read_id = replay_get_qword();
         }
         break;
+
+    /* Events that do not have to be in the queue - ### WHY? */
     case REPLAY_ASYNC_EVENT_INPUT:
         event = g_malloc0(sizeof(Event));
         event->event_kind = read_event_kind;
@@ -220,6 +222,7 @@ static Event *replay_read_event(int checkpoint)
         event->event_kind = read_event_kind;
         event->opaque = 0;
         return event;
+
     default:
         error_report("Unknown ID %d of replay event", read_event_kind);
         exit(1);
@@ -239,8 +242,6 @@ static Event *replay_read_event(int checkpoint)
         return NULL;
     }
 
-    /* Read event-specific data */
-
     return event;
 }
 
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-06 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-06 20:00 [Qemu-devel] [RFH PATCH 0/4] record/replay fixups and doubts Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-06 20:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] replay: generalize ptimer event to bottom halves Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-07  7:53   ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-06 20:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] more replay fixes Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-06 20:13   ` Eric Blake
2015-10-07  8:11   ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-06 20:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] why is runstate_is_running needed? Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-07  8:14   ` Pavel Dovgaluk
     [not found]   ` <22126.3941414238$1444205724@news.gmane.org>
2015-10-07  8:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-07  9:37   ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-06 20:00 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-10-07  8:21   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] events doubts Pavel Dovgaluk
     [not found]   ` <35633.6639299572$1444206177@news.gmane.org>
2015-10-07  8:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-07  9:50       ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-07 10:23         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-07 10:42           ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-07 10:48             ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-07 10:51               ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-07 14:59                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-13  8:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFH PATCH 0/4] record/replay fixups and doubts Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-13 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-23  7:28 ` Pavel Dovgaluk
2015-10-23  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1444161658-15038-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).