From: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
afaerber@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH Trivial] hw/intc/arm_gic: Remove the definition of NUM_CPU
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:11:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446743477-21579-1-git-send-email-wei@redhat.com> (raw)
arm_gic.c retrieves CPU number using either NUM_CPU(s) or s->num_cpu.
Such mixed-uses make source code inconsistent. This patch removes
NUM_CPU(s), which was defined for MPCore tweak long ago, and instead
favors s->num_cpu. The source is more consistent after this tweak.
Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
---
hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
index 8bad132..2f76f0b 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
@@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ static const uint8_t gic_id[] = {
0x90, 0x13, 0x04, 0x00, 0x0d, 0xf0, 0x05, 0xb1
};
-#define NUM_CPU(s) ((s)->num_cpu)
-
static inline int gic_get_current_cpu(GICState *s)
{
if (s->num_cpu > 1) {
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ void gic_update(GICState *s)
int cpu;
int cm;
- for (cpu = 0; cpu < NUM_CPU(s); cpu++) {
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->num_cpu; cpu++) {
cm = 1 << cpu;
s->current_pending[cpu] = 1023;
if (!(s->ctlr & (GICD_CTLR_EN_GRP0 | GICD_CTLR_EN_GRP1))
@@ -567,7 +565,7 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
if (offset == 4)
/* Interrupt Controller Type Register */
return ((s->num_irq / 32) - 1)
- | ((NUM_CPU(s) - 1) << 5)
+ | (s->num_cpu - 1) << 5)
| (s->security_extn << 10);
if (offset < 0x08)
return 0;
@@ -1284,7 +1282,7 @@ static void arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
* GIC v2 defines a larger memory region (0x1000) so this will need
* to be extended when we implement A15.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_CPU(s); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
s->backref[i] = s;
memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[i+1], OBJECT(s), &gic_cpu_ops,
&s->backref[i], "gic_cpu", 0x100);
--
2.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 17:11 Wei Huang [this message]
2015-11-05 17:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH Trivial] hw/intc/arm_gic: Remove the definition of NUM_CPU Andreas Färber
2015-11-05 17:22 ` Wei Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446743477-21579-1-git-send-email-wei@redhat.com \
--to=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).