From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwCAO-0001Mr-Ic for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:53:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwCAN-00034s-Kx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:53:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwCAN-00034o-Fv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:53:07 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8368E23F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:53:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:53:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1447174381-7171-3-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1447174381-7171-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> References: <1447174381-7171-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] migration: Make 32bit linux compile with RDMA List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com Rest of the file already use that trick. 64bit offsets make no sense in 32bit archs, but that is ram_addr_t for you. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- migration/rdma.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c index 553fbd7..dcabb91 100644 --- a/migration/rdma.c +++ b/migration/rdma.c @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, const char *block_name, block->is_ram_block = local->init ? false : true; if (rdma->blockmap) { - g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *) block_offset, block); + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *)(uintptr_t)block_offset, block); } trace_rdma_add_block(block_name, local->nb_blocks, -- 2.5.0