From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uAD-0007qU-16 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:16:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3uAC-0002Ky-3p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:16:48 -0500 From: John Snow Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:16:36 -0500 Message-Id: <1449011799-2790-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.6 0/3] iotests: 124: Don't reopen qcow2 file List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Kevin caught me being Naughty, and because I don't want Santa to be mad at me, I have corrected my ways. Split iotest 124 into two classes so that the iotest that requires a blkdebug filter from the get-go can forego the standard setUp routine and just do it correct the first time. Does this warrant three patches? Not really, but to make the code motion nice to look at, I had to split it out that way. --js ________________________________________________________________________________ For convenience, this branch is available at: https://github.com/jnsnow/qemu.git branch block-iotest-124-qcow2-locking https://github.com/jnsnow/qemu/tree/block-iotest-124-qcow2-locking This version is tagged block-iotest-124-qcow2-locking-v1: https://github.com/jnsnow/qemu/releases/tag/block-iotest-124-qcow2-locking-v1 John Snow (3): iotests: 124: Split into two test classes iotests: 124: move incremental failure test iotests: 124: don't reopen qcow2 tests/qemu-iotests/124 | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) -- 2.4.3