From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6YNs-0003q4-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 01:37:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6YNo-0000fu-Ne for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 01:37:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6YNo-0000fq-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 01:37:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1449643065.26998.2.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:37:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56671BB3.30600@gmail.com> References: <1449583648-12017-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1449583648-12017-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <56671BB3.30600@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] pc: wire up TYPE_IGD_PASSTHROUGH_I440FX_PCI_DEVICE for !xen List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: marcel@redhat.com Cc: igvt-g@ml01.01.org, Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson > Hi Gerd, >=20 > A quick question, does IGD_PASSTHROUGH makes sense for compat machine typ= es? Unlikely to be used in practice, but I don't feel like creating different initialization code paths because of that ... > On the same topic, does machine->igd_gfx_passthru makes sense for all mac= hine types? Same answer ;) cheers, Gerd