From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] target-i386: kvm: Allocate kvm_msrs struct once per VCPU
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:06:42 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450292806-30598-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450292806-30598-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Instead of using 2400 bytes in the stack for 150 MSR entries in
kvm_get_msrs() and kvm_put_msrs(), allocate a buffer once for
each VCPU.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
target-i386/cpu-qom.h | 4 ++++
target-i386/kvm.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu-qom.h b/target-i386/cpu-qom.h
index e3bfe9d..f349b30 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target-i386/cpu-qom.h
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ typedef struct X86CPUClass {
void (*parent_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
} X86CPUClass;
+struct kvm_msrs;
+
/**
* X86CPU:
* @env: #CPUX86State
@@ -119,6 +121,8 @@ typedef struct X86CPU {
struct DeviceState *apic_state;
struct MemoryRegion *cpu_as_root, *cpu_as_mem, *smram;
Notifier machine_done;
+
+ struct kvm_msrs *kvm_msr_buf;
} X86CPU;
static inline X86CPU *x86_env_get_cpu(CPUX86State *env)
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index 6dc9846..660b2d9 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
#define MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK 0x11
#define MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME 0x12
+#define MSR_BUF_SIZE \
+ (sizeof(struct kvm_msrs) + 150 * sizeof(struct kvm_msr_entry))
+
#ifndef BUS_MCEERR_AR
#define BUS_MCEERR_AR 4
#endif
@@ -841,6 +844,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
if (has_xsave) {
env->kvm_xsave_buf = qemu_memalign(4096, sizeof(struct kvm_xsave));
}
+ cpu->kvm_msr_buf = g_malloc0(MSR_BUF_SIZE);
if (env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_MTRR) {
has_msr_mtrr = true;
@@ -1349,6 +1353,11 @@ static void kvm_msr_entry_set(struct kvm_msr_entry *entry,
entry->data = value;
}
+static void kvm_msr_buf_reset(X86CPU *cpu)
+{
+ memset(cpu->kvm_msr_buf, 0, MSR_BUF_SIZE);
+}
+
static int kvm_put_tscdeadline_msr(X86CPU *cpu)
{
CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
@@ -1397,13 +1406,11 @@ static int kvm_put_msr_feature_control(X86CPU *cpu)
static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
{
CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
- struct {
- struct kvm_msrs info;
- struct kvm_msr_entry entries[150];
- } msr_data;
- struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = msr_data.entries;
+ struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries;
int n = 0, i;
+ kvm_msr_buf_reset(cpu);
+
kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, env->sysenter_cs);
kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, env->sysenter_esp);
kvm_msr_entry_set(&msrs[n++], MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP, env->sysenter_eip);
@@ -1562,11 +1569,9 @@ static int kvm_put_msrs(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
}
}
- msr_data.info = (struct kvm_msrs) {
- .nmsrs = n,
- };
+ cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs = n;
- return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, &msr_data);
+ return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_SET_MSRS, cpu->kvm_msr_buf);
}
@@ -1775,13 +1780,11 @@ static int kvm_get_sregs(X86CPU *cpu)
static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
{
CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
- struct {
- struct kvm_msrs info;
- struct kvm_msr_entry entries[150];
- } msr_data;
- struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = msr_data.entries;
+ struct kvm_msr_entry *msrs = cpu->kvm_msr_buf->entries;
int ret, i, n;
+ kvm_msr_buf_reset(cpu);
+
n = 0;
msrs[n++].index = MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS;
msrs[n++].index = MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP;
@@ -1904,11 +1907,9 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
}
}
- msr_data.info = (struct kvm_msrs) {
- .nmsrs = n,
- };
+ cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs = n;
- ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_GET_MSRS, &msr_data);
+ ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_GET_MSRS, cpu->kvm_msr_buf);
if (ret < 0) {
return ret;
}
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-16 19:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-i386: kvm: Increase MSR entry array limits, check for array overrun Eduardo Habkost
2015-12-16 19:06 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2015-12-16 19:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] target-i386: kvm: Increase MSR_BUF_SIZE Eduardo Habkost
2015-12-16 19:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] target-i386: kvm: Simplify MSR array construction Eduardo Habkost
2015-12-16 19:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] target-i386: kvm: Simplify MSR setting functions Eduardo Habkost
2015-12-16 19:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] target-i386: kvm: Eliminate kvm_msr_entry_set() Eduardo Habkost
2015-12-16 21:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] target-i386: kvm: Increase MSR entry array limits, check for array overrun Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-23 15:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450292806-30598-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).