From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVftO-0007t6-TJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:42:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVftL-0001yG-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:42:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVftL-0001y9-I8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:42:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1455630128.7504.96.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:42:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2351494.kn6DdoE8y3@dabox> References: <2351494.kn6DdoE8y3@dabox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v5] i2c-tiny-usb is a small usb to i2c bridge List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tim Sander Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Alex =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Markus Armbruster On Do, 2016-02-11 at 16:09 +0100, Tim Sander wrote: > Probably due to my less then stellar patch to mail handling i think > this > patch got forgotten. I think its ok to resend. Yes, it is ok to avoid it being lost just because the maintainer (/me) was a bit busy. I'd strongly suggest to configure git-send-email and to use that to send patches. Your email client seems to have mangled the patch, git-am refuses to apply it and complains about a malformed patch. thanks, Gerd