From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jordan Justen (Intel address)" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags?
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:38:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457527086.118898.240.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E017AF.2090107@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 464 bytes --]
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 13:31 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
>
> The website based review is a big minus:
> - email is more flexible for formulating a careful, detailed review
Well, assuming people are capable of using email competently. Which
isn't necessarily the case in the EDK2 world. But anyway, I don't think
anyone is suggesting that we *not* require patches to be posted in
email for review. So that's something of a digression.,
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5691 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 10:20 [Qemu-devel] why restrict pull reqs to signed tags? Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 11:35 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 12:13 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 12:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 12:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 12:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-09 12:38 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2016-03-09 12:40 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-09 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 13:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-09 12:34 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 12:42 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 13:09 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 13:27 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-09 14:13 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-09 14:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-03-10 8:21 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-10 8:52 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-03-10 10:34 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-10 12:38 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1457527086.118898.240.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).