From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36315)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@au1.ibm.com>) id 1afZiv-0008D3-Lv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:08:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@au1.ibm.com>) id 1afZit-0000Ys-6j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:08:21 -0400
Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:50810)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@au1.ibm.com>) id 1afZis-0000Xn-KC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:08:19 -0400
Received: from localhost
	by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
	Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <benh@au1.ibm.com>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:08:13 +1000
Message-ID: <1457989626.3107.21.camel@au1.ibm.com>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:07:06 +1100
In-Reply-To: <56E7250C.6060301@redhat.com>
References: <1457974600-13828-1-git-send-email-clg@fr.ibm.com>
	<1457974600-13828-15-git-send-email-clg@fr.ibm.com>
	<56E7250C.6060301@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 14/17] ppc: Add dummy write to
 VTB
Reply-To: benh@au1.ibm.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 21:54 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> I think it would also be possible to use spr_access_nop() for now
> instead of introducing more dummy functions like spr_write_vtb.

Well, the goal was to eventually put some real code in there...

Cheers,
Ben.