From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53456)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1afqFE-0004Zl-KS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:46:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1afqF9-0001aF-4F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:46:48 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55022)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1afqF8-0001Zy-VA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:46:43 -0400
Message-ID: <1458053195.13231.92.camel@redhat.com>
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:46:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20160315161755-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
References: <1458050002-27741-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<56E818BD.2080906@redhat.com>
	<20160315161755-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl.c: disallow command line fw cfg without
	opt/
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>

  Hi,

> > I think we have already gone through this discussion.
>=20
> So now Corey basically is prevented from sorting sanely
> because command line might not start with opt/

Hmm?  There are no guarantees whatsoever if the user used the command
line for entries outside /opt.

Beside that the "sort everything lexical for 2.6+" approach will work
fine.  I think it is more robust and I suspect we will have less hassle
with it long-term.

cheers,
  Gerd