From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Pooja Dhannawat <dhannawatpooja1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch v2 1/1] blizzard: Remove support for DEPTH != 32
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:30:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458289841.6882.16.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_LtboweFSe2WSQPk5g+ur_EvsarLp76hYzPrcfoDsZqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mo, 2016-03-14 at 15:22 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 March 2016 at 15:04, Pooja Dhannawat <dhannawatpooja1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Removing support for DEPTH != 32 from blizzard template header
> > and file that includes it, as macro DEPTH == 32 only used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pooja Dhannawat <dhannawatpooja1@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > hw/display/blizzard.c | 24 ------------------------
> > hw/display/blizzard_template.h | 30 +-----------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 53 deletions(-)
> So are there any cases now when
> surface_bits_per_pixel(qemu_console_surface(c)) can return
> zero? (I don't understand the 'case 0' code in this switch
> at all...)
Looks like a somewhat strange way to zero-fill the function pointer
array. Looks like a historical leftover.
As blizzard uses qemu_console_resize() you will always get a surface
with the default depth (32bpp). So dropping the whole "switch { ... }"
block (except for the "case 32:" lines) and adding an
"assert(surface_bits_per_pixel(surface)==32)" should work just fine.
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 15:04 [Qemu-devel] [Patch v2 1/1] blizzard: Remove support for DEPTH != 32 Pooja Dhannawat
2016-03-14 15:22 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-18 8:30 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2016-03-18 15:46 ` Pooja Dhannawat
2016-03-14 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Pooja Dhannawat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458289841.6882.16.camel@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=dhannawatpooja1@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).