* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] memory: some little optimizations
@ 2016-05-10 2:04 Gonglei
2016-05-10 2:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] exec: adjust rcu_read_lock requirement Gonglei
2016-05-10 2:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] memory: drop some wrappers that waste cpu cycle Gonglei
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gonglei @ 2016-05-10 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: pbonzini, famz, peter.huangpeng, Gonglei
Please see the details in each patch.
v2 -> v1:
- rework an argument's name for clearity in patch 1. [Fam]
- fix some typos in patch 2. [Fam]
- touche block->fd directly and remove the wrappers. [Paolo]
Gonglei (3):
memory: drop find_ram_block()
exec: adjust rcu_read_lock requirement
memory: drop some wrappers that waste cpu cycle
exec.c | 71 ++++++-----------------------------------------
hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 8 ++++--
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 13 +++++----
include/exec/cpu-common.h | 4 +--
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 6 ++--
memory.c | 4 +--
migration/ram.c | 2 +-
migration/savevm.c | 4 +--
8 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
--
1.7.12.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] exec: adjust rcu_read_lock requirement
2016-05-10 2:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] memory: some little optimizations Gonglei
@ 2016-05-10 2:05 ` Gonglei
2016-05-10 2:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] memory: drop some wrappers that waste cpu cycle Gonglei
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gonglei @ 2016-05-10 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: pbonzini, famz, peter.huangpeng, Gonglei
qemu_ram_unset_idstr() doesn't need rcu lock anymore,
meanwhile make the range of rcu lock in
qemu_ram_set_idstr() as small as possible.
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
---
exec.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index c840bc7..117c9a8 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -1417,8 +1417,6 @@ void qemu_ram_set_idstr(RAMBlock *new_block, const char *name, DeviceState *dev)
{
RAMBlock *block;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
assert(new_block);
assert(!new_block->idstr[0]);
@@ -1431,6 +1429,7 @@ void qemu_ram_set_idstr(RAMBlock *new_block, const char *name, DeviceState *dev)
}
pstrcat(new_block->idstr, sizeof(new_block->idstr), name);
+ rcu_read_lock();
QLIST_FOREACH_RCU(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
if (block != new_block &&
!strcmp(block->idstr, new_block->idstr)) {
@@ -1449,12 +1448,9 @@ void qemu_ram_unset_idstr(RAMBlock *block)
* migration. Ignore the problem since hot-unplug during migration
* does not work anyway.
*/
-
- rcu_read_lock();
if (block) {
memset(block->idstr, 0, sizeof(block->idstr));
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int memory_try_enable_merging(void *addr, size_t len)
--
1.7.12.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] memory: drop some wrappers that waste cpu cycle
2016-05-10 2:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] memory: some little optimizations Gonglei
2016-05-10 2:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] exec: adjust rcu_read_lock requirement Gonglei
@ 2016-05-10 2:05 ` Gonglei
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gonglei @ 2016-05-10 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: pbonzini, famz, peter.huangpeng, Gonglei
For better performance, we can use RAMblock
directly stored in memory_region at present.
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
---
exec.c | 33 ++-------------------------------
hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 8 +++++---
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 13 ++++++++-----
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 4 +---
memory.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 117c9a8..f8de928 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -1812,38 +1812,9 @@ void qemu_ram_remap(ram_addr_t addr, ram_addr_t length)
}
#endif /* !_WIN32 */
-int qemu_get_ram_fd(ram_addr_t addr)
+void *qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(RAMBlock *ram_block)
{
- RAMBlock *block;
- int fd;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- block = qemu_get_ram_block(addr);
- fd = block->fd;
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return fd;
-}
-
-void qemu_set_ram_fd(ram_addr_t addr, int fd)
-{
- RAMBlock *block;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- block = qemu_get_ram_block(addr);
- block->fd = fd;
- rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
-void *qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(ram_addr_t addr)
-{
- RAMBlock *block;
- void *ptr;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- block = qemu_get_ram_block(addr);
- ptr = ramblock_ptr(block, 0);
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return ptr;
+ return ramblock_ptr(ram_block, 0);
}
/* Return a host pointer to ram allocated with qemu_ram_alloc.
diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
index e40f23b..1e930fa 100644
--- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
+++ b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
@@ -533,7 +533,9 @@ static void process_msg_shmem(IVShmemState *s, int fd, Error **errp)
}
memory_region_init_ram_ptr(&s->server_bar2, OBJECT(s),
"ivshmem.bar2", size, ptr);
- qemu_set_ram_fd(memory_region_get_ram_addr(&s->server_bar2), fd);
+ assert(s->server_bar2.ram_block);
+ s->server_bar2.ram_block->fd = fd;
+
s->ivshmem_bar2 = &s->server_bar2;
}
@@ -939,8 +941,8 @@ static void ivshmem_exit(PCIDevice *dev)
error_report("Failed to munmap shared memory %s",
strerror(errno));
}
-
- fd = qemu_get_ram_fd(memory_region_get_ram_addr(s->ivshmem_bar2));
+ assert(s->ivshmem_bar2->ram_block);
+ fd = s->ivshmem_bar2->ram_block->fd;
close(fd);
}
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
index 5914e85..5082e04 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
@@ -248,17 +248,18 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev *dev,
for (i = 0; i < dev->mem->nregions; ++i) {
struct vhost_memory_region *reg = dev->mem->regions + i;
ram_addr_t ram_addr;
+ MemoryRegion *mr;
assert((uintptr_t)reg->userspace_addr == reg->userspace_addr);
- qemu_ram_addr_from_host((void *)(uintptr_t)reg->userspace_addr,
+ mr = qemu_ram_addr_from_host((void *)(uintptr_t)reg->userspace_addr,
&ram_addr);
- fd = qemu_get_ram_fd(ram_addr);
+ fd = mr->ram_block->fd;
if (fd > 0) {
msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].userspace_addr = reg->userspace_addr;
msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].memory_size = reg->memory_size;
msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].guest_phys_addr = reg->guest_phys_addr;
msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].mmap_offset = reg->userspace_addr -
- (uintptr_t) qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(ram_addr);
+ (uintptr_t) qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(mr->ram_block);
assert(fd_num < VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
fds[fd_num++] = fd;
}
@@ -622,11 +623,13 @@ static bool vhost_user_can_merge(struct vhost_dev *dev,
mr = qemu_ram_addr_from_host((void *)(uintptr_t)start1, &ram_addr);
assert(mr);
- mfd = qemu_get_ram_fd(ram_addr);
+ assert(mr->ram_block);
+ mfd = mr->ram_block->fd;
mr = qemu_ram_addr_from_host((void *)(uintptr_t)start2, &ram_addr);
assert(mr);
- rfd = qemu_get_ram_fd(ram_addr);
+ assert(mr->ram_block);
+ rfd = mr->ram_block->fd;
return mfd == rfd;
}
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index 5b6e1b8..9a01d4a 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -105,9 +105,7 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_resizeable(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size,
uint64_t length,
void *host),
MemoryRegion *mr, Error **errp);
-int qemu_get_ram_fd(ram_addr_t addr);
-void qemu_set_ram_fd(ram_addr_t addr, int fd);
-void *qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(ram_addr_t addr);
+void *qemu_get_ram_block_host_ptr(RAMBlock *ram_block);
void qemu_ram_free(RAMBlock *block);
int qemu_ram_resize(RAMBlock *block, ram_addr_t newsize, Error **errp);
diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
index 239e6da..9cff7e2 100644
--- a/memory.c
+++ b/memory.c
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ int memory_region_get_fd(MemoryRegion *mr)
assert(mr->ram_block);
- return qemu_get_ram_fd(memory_region_get_ram_addr(mr) & TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
+ return mr->ram_block->fd;
}
void *memory_region_get_ram_ptr(MemoryRegion *mr)
--
1.7.12.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-10 21:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-10 2:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] memory: some little optimizations Gonglei
2016-05-10 2:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] exec: adjust rcu_read_lock requirement Gonglei
2016-05-10 2:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] memory: drop some wrappers that waste cpu cycle Gonglei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).