From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3iI6-0002qb-9k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:08:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3iI3-0007aV-21 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:08:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3iI2-0007aP-Si for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2016 07:08:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1463742499.3526.69.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:08:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1463653560-26958-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <1463723076.3526.0.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] virtio-gpu: scanout limit fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau Cc: QEMU On Fr, 2016-05-20 at 11:52 +0200, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi >=20 > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Do, 2016-05-19 at 12:25 +0200, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote: > >> Here is a small series improving a bit the scanout limit handling. The > >> first patch was sent previously but is also included in this series > >> for convenience. > > > > Doesn't apply cleanly to master, does this depend on unmerged patches? > > >=20 > No, it was based on 8ec4fe0a4b. There is a small header conflict in > the third patch that can be trivially solved. Thanks. Applied against 8ec4fe0a4b & rebased -- in ui queue now. cheers, Gerd