From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9v99-0005Sf-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:04:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9v94-0006b4-K7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:04:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9v94-0006b0-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:04:46 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6B5C04D2A9 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1465221884.2667.2.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:04:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <793068667.3695930.1465219107472.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <1465076003-26291-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <1465076003-26291-12-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <1465194905.24775.180.camel@redhat.com> <793068667.3695930.1465219107472.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 11/14] console: add dpy_gl_scanout2() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau Cc: marcandre lureau , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > > Adding gtk (or sdl2, or both) support would be nice, to see whenever th= e > > interface works if qemu needs to import the dma-buf for display. >=20 > As I explained in cover, it's not easily doable since gtk/sdl2 use > glx, and can't import dmabuf (it needs egl). I could make it work with > gtk/egl (but not gtkglarea, sigh, so many UIs and subtle issues) Ah, ok. Was reading a bit too fast it seems, didn't notice the subtile egl vs. glx thing. cheers, Gerd