From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA3Lb-00041h-KI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:50:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA3LX-0002zs-Vz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:50:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1465253382.4274.90.camel@kernel.crashing.org> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 08:49:42 +1000 In-Reply-To: <5755FADC.6040007@ilande.co.uk> References: <1465208582.4274.47.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <5755FADC.6040007@ilande.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC/PATCH] ppc: Batch TLB flushes on 32-bit 6xx/7xx/7xxx in hash mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 23:36 +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >=20 > After another run of the OpenBIOS tests with this patch applied on top > of the previous 2 patches, I see no regressions introduced. Like C=C3=A9= dric > I don't get the feeling that the Mac machines necessarily run faster, > however the overall experience does feel smoother and more responsive. >=20 > Tested-by: Mark Cave-Ayland Thanks ! Cheers, Ben.