qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, sstabellini@kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony.perard@citrix.com,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/2] xen/blkif: avoid double access to any shared ring request fields
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:05:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465916738-15687-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1606141602430.13466@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>

From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>

Commit f9e98e5d7a ("xen/blkif: Avoid double access to
src->nr_segments") didn't go far enough: src->operation is also being
used twice. And nothing was done to prevent the compiler from using the
source side of the copy done by blk_get_request() (granted that's very
unlikely).

Move the barrier()s up, and add another one to blk_get_request().

Note that for completing XSA-155, the barrier() getting added to
blk_get_request() would suffice, and hence the changes to xen_blkif.h
are more like just cleanup. And since, as said, the unpatched code
getting compiled to something vulnerable is very unlikely (and not
observed in practice), this isn't being viewed as a new security issue.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
---
 hw/block/xen_blkif.h | 12 ++++++------
 hw/block/xen_disk.c  |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/xen_blkif.h b/hw/block/xen_blkif.h
index c68487cb..e3b133b 100644
--- a/hw/block/xen_blkif.h
+++ b/hw/block/xen_blkif.h
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ static inline void blkif_get_x86_32_req(blkif_request_t *dst, blkif_x86_32_reque
 	dst->handle = src->handle;
 	dst->id = src->id;
 	dst->sector_number = src->sector_number;
-	if (src->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
+	/* Prevent the compiler from using src->... instead. */
+	barrier();
+	if (dst->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
 		struct blkif_request_discard *s = (void *)src;
 		struct blkif_request_discard *d = (void *)dst;
 		d->nr_sectors = s->nr_sectors;
 		return;
 	}
-	/* prevent the compiler from optimizing the code and using src->nr_segments instead */
-	barrier();
 	if (n > dst->nr_segments)
 		n = dst->nr_segments;
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
@@ -102,14 +102,14 @@ static inline void blkif_get_x86_64_req(blkif_request_t *dst, blkif_x86_64_reque
 	dst->handle = src->handle;
 	dst->id = src->id;
 	dst->sector_number = src->sector_number;
-	if (src->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
+	/* Prevent the compiler from using src->... instead. */
+	barrier();
+	if (dst->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
 		struct blkif_request_discard *s = (void *)src;
 		struct blkif_request_discard *d = (void *)dst;
 		d->nr_sectors = s->nr_sectors;
 		return;
 	}
-	/* prevent the compiler from optimizing the code and using src->nr_segments instead */
-	barrier();
 	if (n > dst->nr_segments)
 		n = dst->nr_segments;
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
diff --git a/hw/block/xen_disk.c b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
index 064c116..cf57814 100644
--- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c
+++ b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
@@ -679,6 +679,8 @@ static int blk_get_request(struct XenBlkDev *blkdev, struct ioreq *ioreq, RING_I
                              RING_GET_REQUEST(&blkdev->rings.x86_64_part, rc));
         break;
     }
+    /* Prevent the compiler from accessing the on-ring fields instead. */
+    barrier();
     return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 15:04 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] xen-20160614-tag Stefano Stabellini
2016-06-14 15:05 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2016-06-14 15:05   ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 2/2] xen: Clean up includes Stefano Stabellini
2016-06-14 16:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] xen-20160614-tag Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1465916738-15687-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).