From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: serge.fdrv@gmail.com, sergey.fedorov@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] atomics: add volatile_read/volatile_set
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:17:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468851450-9863-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
docs/atomics.txt | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
include/qemu/atomic.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/atomics.txt b/docs/atomics.txt
index c95950b..1f21d2e 100644
--- a/docs/atomics.txt
+++ b/docs/atomics.txt
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ to do so, because it tells readers which variables are shared with
other threads, and which are local to the current thread or protected
by other, more mundane means.
+atomic_read() and atomic_set() only support accesses as large as a
+pointer. If you need to access variables larger than a pointer you
+can use volatile_read() and volatile_set(), but be careful: these always
+use volatile accesses, and 64-bit volatile accesses are not atomic on
+several 32-bit processors such as ARMv7. In other words, volatile_read
+and volatile_set only provide "safe register" semantics when applied to
+64-bit variables.
+
Memory barriers control the order of references to shared memory.
They come in four kinds:
@@ -335,11 +343,16 @@ and memory barriers, and the equivalents in QEMU:
Both semantics prevent the compiler from doing certain transformations;
the difference is that atomic accesses are guaranteed to be atomic,
while volatile accesses aren't. Thus, in the volatile case we just cross
- our fingers hoping that the compiler will generate atomic accesses,
- since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized and
- properly aligned.
+ our fingers hoping that the compiler and processor will provide atomic
+ accesses, since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized
+ and properly aligned.
+
No barriers are implied by atomic_read/set in either Linux or QEMU.
+- volatile_read and volatile_set are equivalent to ACCESS_ONCE in Linux.
+ No barriers are implied by volatile_read/set in QEMU, nor by
+ ACCESS_ONCE in Linux.
+
- atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux are of three kinds:
atomic_OP returns void
diff --git a/include/qemu/atomic.h b/include/qemu/atomic.h
index 7e13fca..8409bdb 100644
--- a/include/qemu/atomic.h
+++ b/include/qemu/atomic.h
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
/* Compiler barrier */
#define barrier() ({ asm volatile("" ::: "memory"); (void)0; })
+/* These will only be atomic if the processor does the fetch or store
+ * in a single issue memory operation
+ */
+#define volatile_read(ptr) (*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr))
+#define volatile_set(ptr, i) ((*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr)) = (i))
+
#ifdef __ATOMIC_RELAXED
/* For C11 atomic ops */
@@ -260,6 +266,17 @@
*/
#define atomic_read(ptr) (*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr))
#define atomic_set(ptr, i) ((*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr)) = (i))
+#define atomic_read(ptr) \
+ ({ \
+ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
+ volatile_read(ptr); \
+ })
+
+#define atomic_set(ptr, i) do { \
+ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
+ volatile_set(ptr, i); \
+} while(0)
+
/**
* atomic_rcu_read - reads a RCU-protected pointer to a local variable
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-18 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 14:17 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-07-18 16:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] atomics: add volatile_read/volatile_set Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 16:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 16:57 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:07 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:17 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:25 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:31 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 19:04 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 20:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468851450-9863-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=serge.fdrv@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.fedorov@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).