qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: serge.fdrv@gmail.com, sergey.fedorov@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] atomics: add volatile_read/volatile_set
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:17:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468851450-9863-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 docs/atomics.txt      | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/qemu/atomic.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/atomics.txt b/docs/atomics.txt
index c95950b..1f21d2e 100644
--- a/docs/atomics.txt
+++ b/docs/atomics.txt
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ to do so, because it tells readers which variables are shared with
 other threads, and which are local to the current thread or protected
 by other, more mundane means.
 
+atomic_read() and atomic_set() only support accesses as large as a
+pointer.  If you need to access variables larger than a pointer you
+can use volatile_read() and volatile_set(), but be careful: these always
+use volatile accesses, and 64-bit volatile accesses are not atomic on
+several 32-bit processors such as ARMv7.  In other words, volatile_read
+and volatile_set only provide "safe register" semantics when applied to
+64-bit variables.
+
 Memory barriers control the order of references to shared memory.
 They come in four kinds:
 
@@ -335,11 +343,16 @@ and memory barriers, and the equivalents in QEMU:
   Both semantics prevent the compiler from doing certain transformations;
   the difference is that atomic accesses are guaranteed to be atomic,
   while volatile accesses aren't. Thus, in the volatile case we just cross
-  our fingers hoping that the compiler will generate atomic accesses,
-  since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized and
-  properly aligned.
+  our fingers hoping that the compiler and processor will provide atomic
+  accesses, since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized
+  and properly aligned.
+
   No barriers are implied by atomic_read/set in either Linux or QEMU.
 
+- volatile_read and volatile_set are equivalent to ACCESS_ONCE in Linux.
+  No barriers are implied by volatile_read/set in QEMU, nor by
+  ACCESS_ONCE in Linux.
+
 - atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux are of three kinds:
 
          atomic_OP          returns void
diff --git a/include/qemu/atomic.h b/include/qemu/atomic.h
index 7e13fca..8409bdb 100644
--- a/include/qemu/atomic.h
+++ b/include/qemu/atomic.h
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
 /* Compiler barrier */
 #define barrier()   ({ asm volatile("" ::: "memory"); (void)0; })
 
+/* These will only be atomic if the processor does the fetch or store
+ * in a single issue memory operation
+ */
+#define volatile_read(ptr)       (*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr))
+#define volatile_set(ptr, i)     ((*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr)) = (i))
+
 #ifdef __ATOMIC_RELAXED
 /* For C11 atomic ops */
 
@@ -260,6 +266,17 @@
  */
 #define atomic_read(ptr)       (*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr))
 #define atomic_set(ptr, i)     ((*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr)) = (i))
+#define atomic_read(ptr)                              \
+    ({                                                \
+    QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
+    volatile_read(ptr);                               \
+    })
+
+#define atomic_set(ptr, i)  do {                      \
+    QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
+    volatile_set(ptr, i);                             \
+} while(0)
+
 
 /**
  * atomic_rcu_read - reads a RCU-protected pointer to a local variable
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18 14:17 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-07-18 16:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] atomics: add volatile_read/volatile_set Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 16:53   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 16:57     ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:07         ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:11           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:17             ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:22               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:25                 ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:28                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 17:31                     ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 17:58                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-18 19:04                         ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-07-18 20:54                           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468851450-9863-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=serge.fdrv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.fedorov@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).