From: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>
Cc: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] linux-aio: reduce completion latency
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:27:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468931263-32667-1-git-send-email-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> (raw)
v2:
o For the third patch do not introduce extra member for LinuxAioState
structure, reuse ret == -EINPROGRESS.
o Add explicit comment which explains why we do not hang if requests
are still pended.
This series are intended to reduce completion latencies by two changes:
1. QEMU does not use any timeout value for harvesting completed AIO
requests from the ring buffer, thus io_getevents() can be implemented
in userspace (first patch).
2. In order to reduce completion latency it makes sense to harvest completed
requests ASAP. Very fast backend device can complete requests just after
submission, so it is worth trying to check ring buffer and peek completed
requests directly after io_submit() has been called (third patch).
Indeed, the series reduces the completions latencies and increases the
overall throughput, e.g. the following is the percentiles of number of
completed requests at once:
1th 10th 20th 30th 40th 50th 60th 70th 80th 90th 99.99th
Before 2 4 42 112 128 128 128 128 128 128 128
After 1 1 4 14 33 45 47 48 50 51 108
That means, that before the third patch is applied the ring buffer is
observed as full (128 requests were consumed at once) in 60% of calls.
After the third patch is applied the distribution of number of completed
requests is "smoother" and the queue (requests in-flight) is almost never
full.
The fio read results are the following (write results are almost the
same and are not showed here):
Before
------
job: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=2227: Tue Jul 19 11:29:50 2016
Description : [Emulation of Storage Server Access Pattern]
read : io=54681MB, bw=1822.7MB/s, iops=179779, runt= 30001msec
slat (usec): min=172, max=16883, avg=338.35, stdev=109.66
clat (usec): min=1, max=21977, avg=1051.45, stdev=299.29
lat (usec): min=317, max=22521, avg=1389.83, stdev=300.73
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 346], 5.00th=[ 596], 10.00th=[ 708], 20.00th=[ 852],
| 30.00th=[ 932], 40.00th=[ 996], 50.00th=[ 1048], 60.00th=[ 1112],
| 70.00th=[ 1176], 80.00th=[ 1256], 90.00th=[ 1384], 95.00th=[ 1496],
| 99.00th=[ 1800], 99.50th=[ 1928], 99.90th=[ 2320], 99.95th=[ 2672],
| 99.99th=[ 4704]
bw (KB /s): min=205229, max=553181, per=12.50%, avg=233278.26, stdev=18383.51
After
------
job: (groupid=0, jobs=8): err= 0: pid=2220: Tue Jul 19 11:31:51 2016
Description : [Emulation of Storage Server Access Pattern]
read : io=57637MB, bw=1921.2MB/s, iops=189529, runt= 30002msec
slat (usec): min=169, max=20636, avg=329.61, stdev=124.18
clat (usec): min=2, max=19592, avg=988.78, stdev=251.04
lat (usec): min=381, max=21067, avg=1318.42, stdev=243.58
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 310], 5.00th=[ 580], 10.00th=[ 748], 20.00th=[ 876],
| 30.00th=[ 908], 40.00th=[ 948], 50.00th=[ 1012], 60.00th=[ 1064],
| 70.00th=[ 1080], 80.00th=[ 1128], 90.00th=[ 1224], 95.00th=[ 1288],
| 99.00th=[ 1496], 99.50th=[ 1608], 99.90th=[ 1960], 99.95th=[ 2256],
| 99.99th=[ 5408]
bw (KB /s): min=212149, max=390160, per=12.49%, avg=245746.04, stdev=11606.75
Throughput increased from 1822MB/s to 1921MB/s, average completion latencies
decreased from 1051us to 988us.
Roman Pen (3):
linux-aio: consume events in userspace instead of calling io_getevents
linux-aio: split processing events function
linux-aio: process completions from ioq_submit()
block/linux-aio.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
--
2.8.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-19 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-19 12:27 Roman Pen [this message]
2016-07-19 12:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] linux-aio: consume events in userspace instead of calling io_getevents Roman Pen
2016-07-19 12:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] linux-aio: split processing events function Roman Pen
2016-07-19 12:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] linux-aio: process completions from ioq_submit() Roman Pen
2016-07-20 9:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] linux-aio: reduce completion latency Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468931263-32667-1-git-send-email-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
--to=roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).