From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQXW9-0005lu-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:17:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQXW7-0001BO-2Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:17:16 -0400 From: Wang WeiWei Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:15:58 +0800 Message-ID: <1469182567-3114-2-git-send-email-wangww.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1469182567-3114-1-git-send-email-wangww.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1469182567-3114-1-git-send-email-wangww.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v22 01/10] unblock backup operations in backing file List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu devel , qemu block , Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng , Max Reitz , Kevin Wolf , Jeff Cody Cc: Paolo Bonzini , John Snow , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Dong Eddie , Jiang Yunhong , zhanghailiang , Gonglei , Wen Congyang , Changlong Xie , Wang Weiwei From: Wen Congyang Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang Signed-off-by: Changlong Xie Signed-off-by: Wang WeiWei --- block.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index 30d64e6..194a060 100644 --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c @@ -1311,6 +1311,23 @@ void bdrv_set_backing_hd(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *backing_hd) /* Otherwise we won't be able to commit due to check in bdrv_commit */ bdrv_op_unblock(backing_hd, BLOCK_OP_TYPE_COMMIT_TARGET, bs->backing_blocker); + /* + * We do backup in 3 ways: + * 1. drive backup + * The target bs is new opened, and the source is top BDS + * 2. blockdev backup + * Both the source and the target are top BDSes. + * 3. internal backup(used for block replication) + * Both the source and the target are backing file + * + * In case 1 and 2, neither the source nor the target is the backing file. + * In case 3, we will block the top BDS, so there is only one block job + * for the top BDS and its backing chain. + */ + bdrv_op_unblock(backing_hd, BLOCK_OP_TYPE_BACKUP_SOURCE, + bs->backing_blocker); + bdrv_op_unblock(backing_hd, BLOCK_OP_TYPE_BACKUP_TARGET, + bs->backing_blocker); out: bdrv_refresh_limits(bs, NULL); } -- 1.9.3