From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, jdenemar@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 06/29] s390x/cpumodel: generate CPU feature group lists
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:58:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470139155-53900-7-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470139155-53900-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Feature groups will be very helpful to reduce the amount of features
typically available in sane configurations. E.g. the MSA facilities
introduced loads of subfunctions, which could - in theory - go away
in the future, but we want to avoid reporting hundrets of features to
the user if usually all of them are in place.
Groups only contain features that were introduced in one shot, not just
random features. Therefore, groups can never change. This is an important
property regarding migration.
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
target-s390x/gen-features.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target-s390x/gen-features.c b/target-s390x/gen-features.c
index 3a7c373..d4f4b29 100644
--- a/target-s390x/gen-features.c
+++ b/target-s390x/gen-features.c
@@ -178,6 +178,35 @@
S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_5, \
S390_FEAT_PPNO_SHA_512_DRNG
+/* cpu feature groups */
+static uint16_t group_PLO[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_PLO,
+};
+static uint16_t group_TOD_CLOCK_STEERING[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_TOD_CLOCK_STEERING,
+};
+static uint16_t group_GEN13_PTFF[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_GEN13_PTFF,
+};
+static uint16_t group_MSA[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA,
+};
+static uint16_t group_MSA_EXT_1[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_1,
+};
+static uint16_t group_MSA_EXT_2[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_2,
+};
+static uint16_t group_MSA_EXT_3[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_3,
+};
+static uint16_t group_MSA_EXT_4[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_4,
+};
+static uint16_t group_MSA_EXT_5[] = {
+ S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_5,
+};
+
/* base features in order of release */
static uint16_t base_GEN7_GA1[] = {
S390_FEAT_GROUP_PLO,
@@ -430,6 +459,34 @@ static CpuFeatDefSpec CpuFeatDef[] = {
CPU_FEAT_INITIALIZER(GEN13_GA2),
};
+#define FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(_name) \
+ { \
+ .name = "S390_FEAT_GROUP_LIST_" #_name, \
+ .bits = \
+ { .data = group_##_name, \
+ .len = ARRAY_SIZE(group_##_name) }, \
+ }
+
+typedef struct {
+ const char *name;
+ BitSpec bits;
+} FeatGroupDefSpec;
+
+/*******************************
+ * feature groups
+ *******************************/
+static FeatGroupDefSpec FeatGroupDef[] = {
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(PLO),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(TOD_CLOCK_STEERING),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(GEN13_PTFF),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA_EXT_1),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA_EXT_2),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA_EXT_3),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA_EXT_4),
+ FEAT_GROUP_INITIALIZER(MSA_EXT_5),
+};
+
static void set_bits(uint64_t list[], BitSpec bits)
{
uint32_t i;
@@ -487,6 +544,28 @@ static void print_feature_defs(void)
}
}
+static void print_feature_group_defs(void)
+{
+ int i, j;
+
+ printf("\n/* CPU feature group list data */\n");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(FeatGroupDef); i++) {
+ uint64_t feat[S390_FEAT_MAX / 64 + 1] = {};
+
+ set_bits(feat, FeatGroupDef[i].bits);
+ printf("#define %s\t", FeatGroupDef[i].name);
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(feat); j++) {
+ printf("0x%016"PRIx64"UL", feat[j]);
+ if (j < ARRAY_SIZE(feat) - 1) {
+ printf(",");
+ } else {
+ printf("\n");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
printf("/*\n"
@@ -501,6 +580,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
" */\n\n"
"#ifndef %s\n#define %s\n", __FILE__, _YEARS, _NAME_H, _NAME_H);
print_feature_defs();
+ print_feature_group_defs();
printf("\n#endif\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.6.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 11:58 [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 00/29] s390x CPU models: exposing features David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 01/29] qmp: details about CPU definitions in query-cpu-definitions David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 13:04 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 14:00 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 14:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 14:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 02/29] s390x/cpumodel: "host" and "qemu" as CPU subclasses David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 03/29] s390x/cpumodel: expose CPU class properties David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 04/29] s390x/cpumodel: introduce CPU features David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 05/29] s390x/cpumodel: generate CPU feature lists for CPU models David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 07/29] s390x/cpumodel: introduce CPU feature group definitions David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 08/29] s390x/cpumodel: register defined CPU models as subclasses David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 09/29] s390x/cpumodel: store the CPU model in the CPU instance David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 10/29] s390x/cpumodel: expose features and feature groups as properties David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 11/29] s390x/cpumodel: let the CPU model handle feature checks David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 12/29] s390x/cpumodel: check and apply the CPU model David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 13/29] s390x/sclp: factor out preparation of cpu entries David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 14/29] s390x/sclp: introduce sclp feature blocks David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 15/29] s390x/sclp: indicate sclp features David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 12:31 ` Thomas Huth
2016-08-02 13:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 16/29] s390x/sclp: propagate the ibc val(lowest and unblocked ibc) David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 17/29] s390x/sclp: propagate the mha via sclp David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 18/29] s390x/sclp: propagate hmfai David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 19/29] linux-headers: update against kvm/next David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 20/29] s390x/kvm: allow runtime-instrumentation for "none" machine David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 21/29] s390x/kvm: implement CPU model support David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 22/29] s390x/kvm: disable host model for existing compat machines David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 23/29] s390x/kvm: let the CPU model control CMM(A) David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 24/29] qmp: add QMP interface "query-cpu-model-expansion" David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 13:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 15:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 15:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-03 7:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 25/29] qmp: add QMP interface "query-cpu-model-comparison" David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 14:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 15:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 15:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-03 7:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-03 17:39 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-04 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-04 14:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 26/29] qmp: add QMP interface "query-cpu-model-baseline" David Hildenbrand
2016-08-04 7:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-04 14:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 27/29] s390x/cpumodel: implement QMP interface "query-cpu-model-expansion" David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 14:22 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 14:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 28/29] s390x/cpumodel: implement QMP interface "query-cpu-model-comparison" David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 11:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 29/29] s390x/cpumodel: implement QMP interface "query-cpu-model-baseline" David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [Patch v1 00/29] s390x CPU models: exposing features Eduardo Habkost
2016-08-02 18:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-08-02 20:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470139155-53900-7-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).