From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42248)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1bhajF-0008Sv-AP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 07:09:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <benh@kernel.crashing.org>) id 1bhajD-000467-E1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 07:09:16 -0400
Message-ID: <1473246508.8689.71.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:08:28 +1000
In-Reply-To: <9eb184de-1c1b-7a8b-3dcb-edfe3143f9b4@kaod.org>
References: <1466545735-2555-2-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org>
	<20160622024622.GK17957@voom.fritz.box>
	<c95690fb-b030-993c-3242-294b6eb63b5a@kaod.org>
	<20160623055002.GC17152@voom.fritz.box>
	<0578ae08-dd95-d517-318e-61b06148321a@redhat.com>
	<96938c4d-4786-6de0-ed45-9598beb28268@kaod.org>
	<01b2c7ef-ec04-caba-6ccc-96c77c98f98b@ilande.co.uk>
	<20160906001640.GA2900@voom.fritz.box>
	<050980a0-52cc-24ee-1416-d8c8edf959bf@ilande.co.uk>
	<9eb184de-1c1b-7a8b-3dcb-edfe3143f9b4@kaod.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/...
 emulation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:50 +0200, C=C3=A9dric Le Goater wrote:
> This is a bit broader than Ben's patch which used PPC_SEGMENT_64B.=C2=A0
> it's basically !PPC_64B which includes the e5500.
>=20
> If so, here is a proposal below adding a new PPC_RFI in the=C2=A0
> "PowerPC Instructions types definitions" enum for that purpose.=C2=A0
> Not much bits left there.

Why not stick to PPC_SEGMENT_64B ?

rfi exists on all 32-bit processors and all non-Book3S (aka server aka
segment/hash) 64-bit. So PPC_SEGMENT_64B is the test we want.

IE. rfi does exist on e5500

Cheers,
Ben.