qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:26:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473319565.6698.18.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31ce90c6-8775-dd71-5aaa-ead4a4b24733@redhat.com>

  Hi,

> I had understood that the xhci could be a legacy PCI device or a PCI 
> Express device depending on the socket it was plugged into (or was that 
> possibly just someone doing some hand-waving over the fact that 
> obscuring the PCI Express capabilities effectively turns it into a 
> legacy PCI device?).

That is correct, it'll work both ways.

> If that's the case, why do you prefer the default 
> USB controller to be added in a root-port rather than as an integrated 
> device (which is what we do with the group of USB2 controllers, as well 
> as the primary video device)

Trying to mimic real hardware as close as possible.  The ich9 uhci/ehci
controllers are actually integrated chipset devices.  The nec xhci is a
express device in physical hardware.

That is more a personal preference though, there are no strong technical
reasons to do it that way.

cheers,
  Gerd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01 13:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-01 13:27 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-01 13:51   ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-01 17:14     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-05 16:24 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-05 20:02   ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-06 13:31     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-06 14:46       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07  6:21       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-09-07  8:06         ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-07  8:23           ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07  8:06         ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07 16:08           ` Alex Williamson
2016-09-07 19:32             ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07 17:55           ` Laine Stump
2016-09-07 19:39             ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07 20:34               ` Laine Stump
2016-09-15  8:38               ` Andrew Jones
2016-09-15 14:20                 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-16 16:50                   ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-09-08  7:33             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-09-06 11:35   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-09-06 13:58     ` Laine Stump
2016-09-07  7:04       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-09-07 18:20         ` Laine Stump
2016-09-08  7:26           ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2016-09-06 14:47     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07  7:53     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-07  7:57       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-04 14:59   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-10-04 15:40     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-04 16:10       ` Laine Stump
2016-10-04 16:43         ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-04 18:08           ` Laine Stump
2016-10-04 18:52             ` Alex Williamson
2016-10-10 12:02               ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-10-10 14:36                 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-11 15:37                   ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-10-04 18:56             ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-04 17:54         ` Laine Stump
2016-10-05  9:17           ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-10 11:09             ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-10-10 14:15               ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-11 13:30                 ` Andrea Bolognani
2016-10-04 15:45     ` Alex Williamson
2016-10-04 16:25       ` Laine Stump
2016-10-05 10:03         ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-06 15:38 ` Alex Williamson
2016-09-06 18:14   ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-06 18:32     ` Alex Williamson
2016-09-06 18:59       ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-09-07  7:44       ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1473319565.6698.18.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=abologna@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=laine@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).